WHO CARES? REBUILDING CARE IN A POST-PANDEMIC WORLD

这一大流行病突出表明，护理工作者提供的必要服务至关重要，影响到每个人。我们的提案将分析这种对护理的关注如何影响护理提供者和护理接受者的做法，以及它如何影响社会政策。通过国际比较扩大我们的关注范围，揭示了新冠肺炎的经验如何在中长期提供经验教训。比较工作将沿着四个主轴进行，包括不同的方面和方法，反映出跨学科小组的情况：㈠这一流行病对提供护理的需要和方式的影响：调查从跨国角度统一数据的替代方法。(ii)大流行后世界的劳动条件和权利：有偿护理工作者的跨国分析。(iii)作为社会基础设施重建公共政策的战略层面和支柱的护理：比较国家和城市实验。(iv)当国家失败时的护理战略：对弱势社区护理提供的定性分析确定轴线是一种交叉和整合不同国家团队研究议程的方式，利用他们的能力实现有组织的思想和方法的交叉施肥。我们对国家和团队的选择将实现两个主要目标。首先，巴西、哥伦比亚、加拿大、法国、英国和美国提供了足够多的社会特征差异，这些差异对于理解国家治理、福利制度、医疗保健系统制度化和对卫生政策的管辖权、护理就业、护理人员的工作条件、劳动力市场非正规程度、家庭医疗保健政策和新冠肺炎疫情政策的不同护理配置至关重要。第二，每个国家小组的主要研究人员都有国家和比较护理专业知识和合作研究的经验。该项目利用不同轴的焦点的地方相关性作为研究设计的优势。虽然每个国家工作队负责深入分析一个主轴，但我们的跨领域研究战略揭示了在所观察到的情况中揭示重大差异的机制

The pandemic has highlighted the centrality of care as a necessary service performed by care workers that affects everyone. Our proposal will analyze how this focus on care has affected the practices of both care providers and care recipients, and how it has influenced social policies. Broadening our focus through international comparisons reveals how the Covid experience provides lessons in the medium and long-term. Comparisons will proceed along four main axes, comprising different dimensions and approaches, reflecting the interdisciplinary team profile:(i) The impact of the pandemic on needs and modalities of care provision: surveying alternative methodologies to harmonize data in a transnational perspective.(ii) Labor conditions and rights in a post pandemic world: transnational analysis of/with paid care workers.(iii) Care as a strategic dimension and pillar for public policies on social infrastructure rebuilding: comparing national and urban experiments.(iv) Caring strategies when the state fails: qualitative analysis of care provision on vulnerable communities.Defining axes is a way to intersect and integrate the research agendas from the different national teams, taking advantage of their competences to achieve an organized cross- fertilization of ideas and methods. Our selection of countries and teams will achieve two main goals. First, Brazil, Colombia, Canada, France, UK and the US provide enough variation in societal characteristics crucial to understanding the different configurations of care across national governance, welfare regime, health-care system institutionalization and jurisdiction over health policy, care employment, working conditions of care workers, level of labor market informality, home health-care policies, and Covid-19 pandemic policies. Second, the principal researchers of each national team have national and comparative care expertise and previous experience in collaborative research. The project leverages the local relevance of the foci from different axes as a strength of the research design. While each country team takes responsibility for an in-depth analysis of one main axis, our cross-cutting research strategy uncovers the mechanisms that reveals significant differences in the observed situations