Disciplining British IR: How the professionalization of higher-education and social media have shaped the discipline of International Relations in th
Disciplining British IR: How the professionalization of higher-education and social media have shaped the discipline of International Relations in th
批准号:
2443410
负责人:
金额:
$0.0万
依托单位:
依托单位国家:
英国
项目类别:
Studentship
财政年份:
2020
资助国家:
英国
项目状态:
未结题
起止时间:
2020 至 --
中文摘要
这个项目探索了英国国际关系研究(IR)的“监管”,看看高等教育议程的变化是否助长了不符合“专业”标准的方法的边缘化。这一点很重要;一门学科的地位是“不太恰当的知识”,这对学生的参与度、职业前景、职业机会和大学内学者的福祉都有不利影响(Pereira,2017,p.3)。这项研究的重点是从2001年到2020年,将考察学术界内的三个重要发展对IR的影响:(I)RAE/REF(研究评估/卓越研究框架)所定义的“影响”对议程设置的影响,(Ii)在学术界内使用衡量标准来衡量成功,以及(Iii)通过社交媒体运作的公共智力的兴起。通过采用政治社会学的方法来分析国际关系在这一背景下的状况,这种跨机构和跨学科的研究可以产生原创性研究,向更广泛的社会科学通报高等教育议程设置的影响,以及新发展的影响,如社交媒体在学院内的普及。理解这些发展至关重要,不仅是因为它们影响了国际关系的研究,也不是因为它们对整个社会科学的影响,还因为大学内部的这些发展塑造了英国学者和毕业生如何为现实世界制定政策。
英文摘要
This project explores the 'policing' of the study of International Relations (IR) in Britain to see if changes to the higher-education agenda have fuelled the marginalisation of approaches that do not fit in with 'professional' standards. This is important; a subject's status as 'not quite proper knowledge' has a detrimental impact on student engagement, career prospects, professional opportunities and the well-being of scholars within universities (Pereira, 2017, p. 3). Focusing from 2001 to 2020, this study will examine the impact of three important developments within academia upon IR: (i) the agenda-setting influence of 'impact' as defined by the RAE/REF (Research Assessment Exercise/Research Excellence Framework), (ii) the use of metrics within academia to gauge success, and (iii) the rise of the public intellectual operating via social media. By adopting a political-sociological approach to analyse the state of IR within this backdrop, this cross-institutional and interdisciplinary study can produce original research that informs the wider social sciences of the implications of higher-education agenda-setting, as well as the implications of new developments, such as prevalence of social media within the academy. Such developments are crucial to understand, not just because they effect the study of IR, nor because of the implications for the entire social sciences, but because these developments within universities shape how Britain's academics and graduates form policies for the real world.
期刊论文(0)
专著(0)
科研奖励(0)
会议论文
海外基金