Freedom from Hegel: Heidegger's question and Schmitt's constitution

这个项目的中心是人类学与海德格尔和施米特的国家概念的关系。对施密特和海德格尔的许多解释都坚持认为他们的人类学预设与他们的政治承诺之间存在根本性的断裂（舒曼、南希、德维尔、利文斯）。另一种立场坚持认为这两者是不可分割的（法耶）。本项目旨在回答的核心问题是，在这场争论中，谁是正确的。为了回答这个问题，我建议用第一个英文来考察施密特和海德格尔的政治生活概念的共同根源，即他们分别对黑格尔的《法哲学》进行批判，但也进行吸收和变形。他们对黑格尔的批判同时也是对唯心主义和自由主义自由观的一种肯定，对政治、法律的和哲学思想产生了广泛的影响。因此，他们的自由观念是我研究的关键因素。

This project centres around the relation of anthropology to the concept of the state in Heidegger andSchmitt. Many interpretations of Schmitt and Heidegger insist on a radical rupture between theiranthropological presuppositions and their political commitments (Schurmann, Nancy, DeVille, Lievens).Another position insists that these are inseparable (Faye). The central question that this project will aimto answer is who, in this dispute, is right. In order to answer this, I propose the first English languageexamination of the common roots of Schmitt and Heidegger's concept of political life in their respectivecritique - but also absorption and transfiguration - of Hegel's Philosophy of Right. Their critique of Hegeldoubles as a contestation of idealist and liberal concepts of freedom with wide-ranging repercussions forpolitical, legal and philosophical thought. Hence, their notions of freedom are the pivotal element in myinvestigation.