The distribution of phase-unlocking and phase-edge movement and its implications for phase theory

我的建议有两个目标：(i)建立两种不同的相位提取策略的分布-边缘移动和解锁；(2)修正相理论，从而推导出这个。目标(i)很重要，因为与大多数先前的假设相反，最近的研究表明，边缘移动/解锁都是以互补分布的方式发生的：某些类型的相位外移动涉及穿过相位边缘；其他类型不需要，但是相位头必须与“未锁定”一致。这适用于DP (Branan & Davis 2019, B&D; Branan 2018， B)，也适用于CP通过规范CP（例如van Urk 2019）提供边缘运动的证据，但也适用于解锁（Rackowski & Richards 2005, VanUrk & Richards 2015）。我计划使用跨语言证据来找出决定分布的因素。先前的建议包括在深度嵌入材料（B&D）或边缘移动是反局部(B)的材料（其他地方的边缘移动）的解锁之间进行对比-但这只涉及DP，而不是跨语言应用。至关重要的是，这也需要修正相理论。标准相位理论只允许边缘移动，因为相位一旦完成就会将材料从语法中转移出去，因此无法通过随后的“解锁”来拯救它。我将追求基于干预的“相位”理论，将最近减少相位（Thivierge 2021）和边缘运动（Keine & zeeijlstra 2021）的工作扩展到（phi-）干预。这将允许将局部性简化为一个概念，即干预。

My proposal has two goals: (i) to establish the distributions of two different strategies for extracting from phases - edge-movement and unlocking; and (ii) to amend phase theory so that it derives this. Goal-(i) matters because, contra most prior assumptions, recent work suggests both edge-movement/unlocking occur, in complementary distribution: sometypes of movement out of phases involve passing through the phase-edge; other types don't, but the phase-head mustbe Agreed with qua 'unlocked'. This applies to DP (Branan & Davis 2019, B&D; Branan 2018, B), and also CP givenevidence for edge-movement through spec-CP (e.g. van Urk 2019) but also unlocking (Rackowski & Richards 2005, VanUrk & Richards 2015). I plan to use cross-linguistic evidence to work out what determines the distribution. Priorsuggestions include a contrast between unlocking for deeply-embedded material (B&D) or for material for which edge-movement is anti-local (B), edge-movement elsewhere - but this involves DP only, and isn't applied cross-linguistically.Crucially, this also requires amending phase theory. Standard phase-theory only allows edge-movement, becausephases Transfer material out of syntax once completed - so it can't be rescued by subsequent 'unlocking'. I'd pursue anintervention-based 'phase' theory, expanding recent work reducing phasehood (Thivierge 2021) and edge-movement(Keine & Zeijlstra 2021) to (phi-)intervention. This would allow reducing locality to one notion, intervention.