Linking Provider Cost Curves and Care Delivery Practices: Implications for VBP

描述(由申请人提供)：保费的逐年大幅增长(加州医生组织的年平均增长率为14.6%)导致综合医疗保健协会由健康计划、购买者和医生组织(POS)组成的多方利益相关者团体取代了他们长期只关注质量改进的P4P计划，代之以基于价值的购买(VBP)计划，该计划旨在弯曲成本曲线并提高质量。风险收入的百分比将从P4P下的~1%增加到VBP下的~8%。该计划计划于2013年生效。我们的研究将评估全州范围内的IHA VBP计划，该计划可能会弯曲成本曲线，并将代表美国最大的VBP实验之一，目标是与六大医疗计划签约的200个PoS。通过分析POS对新激励结构的行为反应，我们将检验关键的国家政策问题，即VPB是否、为什么以及在什么情况下弯曲成本曲线。我们将纵向评估的结果包括PO总护理成本(横截面和趋势)及其组成部分(药房、门诊、医院和辅助)、质量业绩、奖励支出和护理交付实践的变化。该项目的数据来自多个来源：来自IHA的总护理成本和高质量绩效数据(来自健康计划和POS)、从健康计划向POS支付的奖励款项，以及我们从POS收集的访谈数据。我们将使用统计方法来生成PO成本曲线，调查解释各种成本概况的潜在成本动因，并检查PO对VBP的行为反应，这些反应与他们在VBP暴露的4年内修改(或不修改)其成本轨迹的能力有关。成本曲线提供有关成本水平以及形状和方向(即轨迹)的信息，我们将跟踪PO成本曲线随时间的变化。 公共卫生相关性：我们的研究将评估全州综合医疗保健协会的基于价值的采购(VBP)计划，该计划是美国最大的VBP试验之一，目标是200个医生组织(POS)。我们将分析POS对新激励结构的行为反应，并检验VPB是否、为什么以及在什么情况下弯曲成本曲线。我们将使用统计方法来生成PO成本概况，并确定与不同PO成本概况相关联的护理交付流程，以控制市场 各种因素。这项研究考察了采购订单成本概况是否以及如何随着时间的推移而变化，以应对VBP，以及哪些因素与弯曲成本曲线的能力有关，这对改变供应商做法和广泛使用VBP作为改革政策具有影响。

DESCRIPTION (provided by applicant): The large and unrelenting year-to-year growth in premiums (median increase of 14.6% a year among physician organizations in California) has led the Integrated Healthcare Association's multi-stakeholder group of health plans, purchasers, and physician organizations (POs) to replace their longstanding P4P program, which focused only on quality improvement, with a value-based purchasing (VBP) program that seeks to bend the cost curve and improve quality. The percent of revenue at risk will increase from the ~1% of capitation payment under P4P to ~8% of capitation payments under VBP. The program is slated to go into effect in 2013. Our study will evaluate the statewide IHA VBP plan, which has the potential to bend the cost curve, and will represent one of the largest VBP experiments in the U.S., targeting 200 POs that contract with six major health plans. By analyzing the behavioral response of POs to the new incentive structure, we will examine the critical national policy issue of whether, why, and under what circumstances VPB bends the cost curve. The outcomes we will evaluate longitudinally include changes in PO total costs of care (both cross-section and trend) and its component elements (pharmacy, ambulatory, hospital, and ancillary), quality performance, incentive payouts, and care delivery practices. Data for the project draws from multiple sources: total cost of care and quality performance data from IHA (derived from health plans and POs), incentive payments made to POs from health plans, and interview data that we collect from the POs. We will use statistical approaches to generate PO cost curves, investigate underlying cost drivers that explain various cost profiles, and examine PO behavioral responses to VBP that were associated with their ability to modify (or not modify) their cost trajectories ovr 4 years of exposure to the VBP. Cost curves provide information on cost levels as well as shape and orientation (i.e., trajectory), and we will track changes in PO cost curves over time. PUBLIC HEALTH RELEVANCE: Our study will evaluate the statewide Integrated Healthcare Association's value-based purchasing (VBP) plan, one of the largest VBP experiments in the U.S. that targets 200 physician organizations (POs). We will analyze the behavioral response of POs to the new incentive structure and examine whether, why, and under what circumstances VPB bends the cost curve. We will use statistical approaches to generate PO cost profiles, and identify care delivery processes associated with different PO cost profiles, controlling for market factors. The study examines whether and how PO cost profiles shift over time in response to the VBP and what factors are associated with the ability to bend the cost curve, which has implications for changing provider practices and broad use of VBP as a reform policy.