Social Reasoning in Psychopathy
Social Reasoning in Psychopathy
批准号:
7912327
负责人:
Elsa Ruth Ermer
金额:
$5.18万
依托单位:
依托单位国家:
美国
项目类别:
财政年份:
2010
资助国家:
美国
项目状态:
已结题
起止时间:
2010-04-01 至 2012-03-31
关键词:
AddressAffectAffectiveAmygdaloid structureAnimalsAnteriorAreaBase of the BrainBehaviorBehavioralBilateralBrainBrain imagingBrain regionChronicCognitiveCommunitiesContractsDataDecision MakingDetectionEmotionalEventEvolutionFemaleFrequenciesFunctional Magnetic Resonance ImagingFunctional disorderGeneral PopulationGoalsHaresHumanImageImage AnalysisImpairmentImprisonmentIncidenceIndividualIntelligenceLeadLimbic SystemMagnetic Resonance ImagingMental disordersMindNatureNeurocognitiveNew MexicoOutputParticipantPatientsPatternPerformancePersonality DisordersPopulationPrisonerPrisonsProcessPsychopathReaction TimeRecruitment ActivityRelative (related person)ResearchRestSamplingSocial ConditionsSpecificitySubstance abuse problemSystemTemporal LobeWomanWorkbasecingulate cortexcosteffective therapyexpectationhigh riskindependent component analysismalemenpsychopathic personalitypublic health relevancerelating to nervous systemsocialtheoriestreatment strategy
中文摘要
描述(由候选人提供):精神病是一种严重的人格障碍,包括人际关系、情感和行为因素。精神变态的一个特征是持续违反社会契约,即欺骗。在像人类这样的合作物种中,这种行为的社会代价是巨大的。事实上,与动物界的其他动物相比,(正常的)人类合作的频率和程度令人震惊。进化分析已经确定了合作进化所必需的几种认知能力,包括发现作弊者的能力。大量数据表明,正常人在对社交交流进行推理时,善于发现作弊者,而且关于这种能力背后的大脑区域的证据已经开始积累。行为和神经数据都表明,社会交换推理在功能上不同于其他类型的推理(例如,预防性推理)。本研究的目的是探讨精神病患者的社会交换推理。具体地说,目的是解决以下问题:关于社会交换的推理(即,发现作弊者)是否在精神变态中受到损害?精神病患者会像正常健康的人一样,招募同样的大脑区域来推理社会交换吗?在精神病患者中,社会交换推理与情商之间的关系是否与正常人相同?该研究采用事件相关的功能磁共振成像技术,通过使用Wason选择任务,研究被监禁精神病患者的行为表现和大脑基础,并控制参与者对社会交换、预防和社会描述规则的推理。包括这两种类型的规则将使我们能够调查结果对社会交换的特殊性。正常人在社会交换和预防规则方面的表现同样出色;精神病患者是高风险承担者,这表明预防推理将是有益的。社会描述性规则在本质上也是社会性的,但不符合社会交换规则的输入条件;正常个体对这种区分非常敏感。WASON SELECTIONS任务是成像研究的理想选择,因为三种类型的推理问题只在内容上不同--任务要求在问题类型上是相同的。
英文摘要
DESCRIPTION (provided by candidate): Psychopathy is a serious personality disorder with interpersonal, affective, and behavioral components. One hallmark of psychopathy is the persistent violation of social contracts, i.e., cheating. In a cooperative species such as humans, the societal costs of this behavior are tremendous. Indeed, the frequency and extent of (normal) humans' cooperation is astounding compared to the rest of the animal kingdom. Evolutionary analyses have identified several cognitive abilities necessary for cooperation to evolve, including the ability to detect cheaters. A large body of data has demonstrated that normal individuals are adept at detecting cheaters when reasoning about social exchange, and evidence about which brain regions underlie this ability has begun to accrue. Both the behavioral and neural data indicate that social exchange reasoning is functionally distinct from other types of reasoning (e.g., precautionary reasoning). The goal of the proposed research is to investigate social exchange reasoning in psychopathy. Specifically, the aim is to address the following questions: Is reasoning about social exchange (i.e., cheater detection) impaired in psychopathy? Do psychopaths recruit the same brain regions to reason about social exchange that normal, healthy individuals do? Does social exchange reasoning show the same relationship with emotional intelligence in psychopaths as it does in normal individuals? The proposed studies employ event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging to investigate the behavioral performance and brain basis of incarcerated psychopaths' and control participants' reasoning about social exchange, precautionary, and social descriptive rules, using the Wason selection task. Including these two types of rules will allow us to investigate the specificity of the results to social exchange. Normal individuals perform equally well on social exchange and precautionary rules; psychopaths are high risk-takers,suggesting precautionary reasoning will be informative. Social descriptive rules are also social in nature, but fail to fit the input conditions for social exchange rules; normal individuals are very sensitive to this distinction. The Wason selections task is ideal for imaging studies in that the three types of reasoning problems differ only in their content-the task demands are identical across problem type.
期刊论文(0)
专著(0)
科研奖励(0)
会议论文
Social Reasoning in Psychopathy
-
批准号:8059684
-
项目类别:
-
资助金额:$5.44万
-
财政年份:2010
-
负责人:Elsa Ruth Ermer
-
依托单位:
海外基金