Salient safety conditioning improves novel discrimination learning.
Salient safety conditioning improves novel discrimination learning.
复制标题
DOI:
10.1016/j.bbr.2020.112907
复制
发表时间:
2021-01-15
影响因子:
2.7
通讯作者:
Likhtik E
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Nahmoud I;Vasquez JG;Cho H;Dennis-Tiwary T;Likhtik E
Generalized fear is one purported mechanism of anxiety that is a target of clinical and basic research. Impaired fear discrimination has been primarily examined from the perspective of increased fear learning, rather than how learning about non-threatening stimuli affects fear discrimination. To address this question, we tested how three Safety Conditioning protocols with varied levels of salience allocated to the safety cue compared to classic Fear Conditioning in their impact on subsequent innate anxiety, and differential fear learning of new aversive and neutral cues. Using a high anxiety strain of mice (129SvEv, Taconic), we show that Fear Conditioned animals show little exploration of the anxiogenic center of an open field 24 hours later, and poor discrimination during new differential conditioning 7 days later. Three groups of mice underwent Safety Conditioning, (i) the safety tone was unpaired with a shock, (ii) the safety tone was unpaired with the shock and co-terminated with a house light signaling the end of the safety period, and (iii) the safety tone was unpaired with the shock and its beginning co-occurred with a house light, signaling the start of a safety period. Mice from all Safety Conditioning groups showed higher levels of open field exploration than the Fear Conditioned mice 24 hours after training. Furthermore, Safety Conditioned animals showed improved discrimination learning of a novel non-threat, with the Salient Beginning safety conditioned group performing best. These findings indicate that high anxiety animals benefit from salient safety training to improve exploration and discrimination of new non-threating stimuli.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子:
16.2
作者:
Guo W;Robert B;Polley DB
通讯作者:
Polley DB
DOI:
10.1038/npp.2009.109
发表时间:
2010-01
期刊:
Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology
影响因子:
--
作者:
通讯作者:
--
影响因子:
5.3
作者:
Genud-Gabai, Rotem;Klavir, Oded;Paz, Rony
通讯作者:
Paz, Rony
影响因子:
3.7
作者:
Fonio, Ehud;Benjamini, Yoav;Golani, Ilan
通讯作者:
Golani, Ilan
影响因子:
64.8
作者:
Grewe BF;Gründemann J;Kitch LJ;Lecoq JA;Parker JG;Marshall JD;Larkin MC;Jercog PE;Grenier F;Li JZ;Lüthi A;Schnitzer MJ
通讯作者:
Schnitzer MJ