The influence of monetary reward on proactive and reactive control in adolescent males.
The influence of monetary reward on proactive and reactive control in adolescent males.
复制标题
DOI：
10.1016/j.dcn.2021.100934
复制
发表时间：
2021-04
影响因子：
4.7
通讯作者：
Fox NA
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Bowers ME;Morales S;Buzzell GA;Fox NA
Reward reduced RT interference during reactive control, but increased RT interference during proactive control in male adolescents. Increased reward-related cue-locked theta power was associated with increased RT interference on proactive trials. Increased reward-related stimulus-locked theta inter-channel phase synchrony was related to facilitated performance on proactive trials. Adolescence is marked by increased reward-seeking, which can alter cognitive control abilities. Previous research found that rewards actually improve cognitive control in children, adolescents, and adults, but these studies only investigated reactive control. The goal of the current study was to elucidate reward’s influence on both proactive and reactive control during adolescence. To this end, 68 (Mean age = 13.61, SD = 2.52) male adolescents completed a rewarded cued flanker paradigm while electroencephalogram (EEG) was collected. Theta power and inter-channel phase synchrony, both implicated in cognitive control, were quantified after cues and stimuli to understand their role during reward-cognitive control interactions. The data suggest that reward reduced interference during reactive control; however, reward increased interference during proactive control in this sample of adolescent males. Reward-related increases in cue-locked theta power predicted more reward-related RT interference on proactive trials. In contrast, increases in stimulus-locked theta ICPS were associated with better performance on rewarded proactive trials. The pattern of results show that reward differentially impacted proactive and reactive control in adolescence, which may have implications for the increased risk-taking behaviors observed during adolescence.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子：
3.8
作者：
Chiew KS;Braver TS
通讯作者：
Braver TS
影响因子：
4.7
作者：
Elke S;Wiebe SA
通讯作者：
Wiebe SA
影响因子：
3.7
作者：
Durston, S;Davidson, MC;Casey, BJ
通讯作者：
Casey, BJ
影响因子：
5.7
作者：
Buzzell GA;Barker TV;Troller-Renfree SV;Bernat EM;Bowers ME;Morales S;Bowman LC;Henderson HA;Pine DS;Fox NA
通讯作者：
Fox NA
DOI：
10.1093/cercor/bhp225
发表时间：
2010-07
期刊：
Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991)
影响因子：
--
作者：
Geier CF;Terwilliger R;Teslovich T;Velanova K;Luna B
通讯作者：
Luna B