The Advocacy Coalition Index: A new approach for identifying advocacy coalitions

The Advocacy Coalition Index: A new approach for identifying advocacy coalitions
复制标题

倡导联盟指数:识别倡导联盟的新方法

DOI:
10.1111/psj.12450
复制
发表时间:
2023
影响因子:
3.8
通讯作者:
Tuomas Yla‐Anttila
Tuomas Yla‐Anttila
中科院分区:
管理学2区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Keiichi Satoh;Antti Gronow;Tuomas Yla‐Anttila

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

政策学者越来越关注利益相关者联盟之间的合作和竞争关系。倡导联盟框架(ACF)尤其将学术界的注意力引向了这种关系。ACF将倡导联盟定义为分享信仰并协调行动的行动者团体。然而,以往的研究在定义和衡量联盟方面一直不一致,这阻碍了比较研究和理论建设。我们提出了一种称为倡导联盟指数(Advocacy Coalition Index)的方法,该方法衡量信念相似性和行动协调性,从而有可能评估政策子系统中倡导联盟的程度,子群体是否类似于联盟,以及个体行为者如何促进联盟的形成。该指数为确定可用于比较研究的联盟提供了一种标准化方法。为了说明该指数的有效性,我们分析了两个气候变化政策子系统,即芬兰和瑞典,这两个子系统在信念相似性与协调性的关联方面有所不同。我们证明,该指数在识别不同类型的子系统、联盟和对联盟形成贡献最大的参与者以及参与跨联盟经纪的参与者方面表现良好。
Policy scholars have increasingly focused on collaborative and competitive relationships between stakeholder coalitions. The Advocacy Coalition Framework (ACF) in particular has directed scholarly attention toward such relationships. The ACF defines advocacy coalitions as groups of actors who share beliefs and coordinate their action. However, previous research has been inconsistent in defining and measuring coalitions, which has hampered comparative research and theory building. We present a method called the Advocacy Coalition Index, which measures belief similarity and the coordination of action in a manner that makes it possible to assess the extent to which advocacy coalitions are found in policy subsystems, whether subgroups resemble coalitions, and how individual actors contribute to coalition formation. The index provides a standardized method for identifying coalitions that can be applied to comparative research. To illustrate the effectiveness of the index, we analyze two climate change policy subsystems, namely Finland and Sweden, which have been shown to differ in terms of the association of belief similarity with coordination. We demonstrate that the index performs well in identifying the different types of subsystems, coalitions, and actors that contribute the most to coalition formation, as well as those involved in cross‐coalition brokerage.
DOI: 10.1111/j.1541-0072.2008.00299.x
发表时间: 2009
影响因子: 3.8
作者:
C. Weible;P. Sabatier;K. McQueen
通讯作者: K. McQueen
DOI: 10.1111/j.1541-0072.2008.00287.x
发表时间: 2008-11
影响因子: 3.8
作者:
C. Weible
通讯作者: C. Weible
向无煤未来的有争议的过渡:捷克共和国的倡导联盟和煤炭政策
DOI: 10.1016/j.erss.2019.101283
发表时间: 2019
影响因子: 6.7
作者:
Petr Ocelík;K. Svobodova;Markéta Hendrychová;L. Lehotský;J. Everingham;Saleem H Ali;J. Badera;A. Lechner
通讯作者: A. Lechner
政策过程中的短期与长期联盟:汽车污染控制,1963-1989
DOI: 10.1111/j.0190-292x.2004.00054.x
发表时间: 2004
影响因子: 3.8
作者:
M. Zafonte;P. Sabatier
通讯作者: P. Sabatier
DOI: 10.1080/09644016.2018.1458406
发表时间: 2018
影响因子: 5.5
作者:
Paul M. Wagner;Tuomas Ylä‐Anttila
通讯作者: Tuomas Ylä‐Anttila