Impact of individual demographic and social factors on human-wildlife interactions: a comparative study of three macaque species.

Impact of individual demographic and social factors on human-wildlife interactions: a comparative study of three macaque species.
复制标题

个体人口和社会因素对人类与野生动物相互作用的影响:三种猕猴物种的比较研究。

DOI:
10.1038/s41598-020-78881-3
复制
发表时间:
2020-12-15
期刊:
影响因子:
4.6
通讯作者:
McCowan B
McCowan B
中科院分区:
综合性期刊3区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Balasubramaniam KN;Marty PR;Samartino S;Sobrino A;Gill T;Ismail M;Saha R;Beisner BA;Kaburu SSK;Bliss-Moreau E;Arlet ME;Ruppert N;Ismail A;Sah SAM;Mohan L;Rattan SK;Kodandaramaiah U;McCowan B

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

尽管人类与野生动物之间的冲突越来越多,但关于个体野生动物的属性和行为如何影响人类与野生动物之间的相互作用的研究却很少。采用比较的方法,我们研究了动物的生活史和社会属性对人类之间的相互作用的影响和(非)城市猕猴在亚洲。对于10组恒河猴,长尾猕猴和帽子猕猴,我们收集了11-20个月的社会行为,空间数据和人类互动数据。混合模型分析表明,在所有物种中,男性和空间周边的个人与人类互动最多,高排名的个人发起更多的互动与人类比低排名。在软帽猕猴中,而不是恒河猴或长尾猕猴,在梳理网络中连接更好的个体比连接不好的个体更频繁地与人类互动。从进化的角度来看,我们的研究结果表明,个人招致较低的成本与他们的生活史(男性)和资源访问(高排名;强大的社会关系内的社会宽容猕猴物种),但也较高的成本,因为妥协的优势,是在他们的集团的核心(空间外围),是最有可能采取的风险与人类在人为环境中互动。从保护的角度来看,评估个人行为将更好地为尽量减少冲突相关成本和动物传染病风险的努力提供信息。
Despite increasing conflict at human–wildlife interfaces, there exists little research on how the attributes and behavior of individual wild animals may influence human–wildlife interactions. Adopting a comparative approach, we examined the impact of animals’ life-history and social attributes on interactions between humans and (peri)urban macaques in Asia. For 10 groups of rhesus, long-tailed, and bonnet macaques, we collected social behavior, spatial data, and human–interaction data for 11–20 months on pre-identified individuals. Mixed-model analysis revealed that, across all species, males and spatially peripheral individuals interacted with humans the most, and that high-ranking individuals initiated more interactions with humans than low-rankers. Among bonnet macaques, but not rhesus or long-tailed macaques, individuals who were more well-connected in their grooming network interacted more frequently with humans than less well-connected individuals. From an evolutionary perspective, our results suggest that individuals incurring lower costs related to their life-history (males) and resource-access (high rank; strong social connections within a socially tolerant macaque species), but also higher costs on account of compromising the advantages of being in the core of their group (spatial periphery), are the most likely to take risks by interacting with humans in anthropogenic environments. From a conservation perspective, evaluating individual behavior will better inform efforts to minimize conflict-related costs and zoonotic-risk.
DOI: 10.1007/s10393-017-1284-3
发表时间: 2017-12
期刊: EcoHealth
影响因子: 2.5
作者:
Carne C;Semple S;MacLarnon A;Majolo B;Maréchal L
通讯作者: Maréchal L
DOI: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2019.03.009
发表时间: 2019-05-01
期刊: ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR
影响因子: 2.5
作者:
Balasubramaniam, Krishna N.;Beisner, Brianne A.;McCowan, Brenda
通讯作者: McCowan, Brenda
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0031382
发表时间: 2012-02-08
期刊: PLOS ONE
影响因子: 3.7
作者:
Chiyo, Patrick I.;Moss, Cynthia J.;Alberts, Susan C.
通讯作者: Alberts, Susan C.
DOI: 10.5751/es-06881-190343
发表时间: 2014-01-01
影响因子: 4.1
作者:
Carter, Neil H.;Vina, Andres;Liu, Jianguo
通讯作者: Liu, Jianguo
DOI: 10.1111/cobi.12654
发表时间: 2016-08-01
影响因子: 6.3
作者:
Berger-Tal, Oded;Blumstein, Daniel T.;Swaisgood, Ronald R.
通讯作者: Swaisgood, Ronald R.