Cognitive bias modification for facial interpretation: a randomized controlled trial of transfer to self-report and cognitive measures in a healthy sample.

Cognitive bias modification for facial interpretation: a randomized controlled trial of transfer to self-report and cognitive measures in a healthy sample.
复制标题

DOI:
10.1098/rsos.170681
复制
发表时间:
2017-12
影响因子:
3.5
通讯作者:
Robinson OJ
Robinson OJ
中科院分区:
综合性期刊3区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Peters SE;Lumsden J;Peh OH;Penton-Voak IS;Munafò MR;Robinson OJ

文献摘要

参考文献

相似文献

认知偏差修正是一种潜在的低强度情绪障碍干预,但先前的研究显示成败参半。本研究探讨了面部解释偏差修正(FIBM),一种类似的范式,旨在改变面部的情绪解释(和/或感知),是否会转移到:(i)自我报告的症状和(ii)一系列认知任务。在一项预先注册的双盲随机对照试验中,健康参与者接受了8次FIBM在线治疗(N = 52)或8次假治疗(N = 52)。虽然我们重复了FIBM在干预组成功地改变了模糊的面部表情解释,但这并没有转移到大多数自我报告或认知测量中。然而,有微弱的,不确定的证据转移到压力的自我报告测量,快感缺乏的认知测量,以及证据表明结果被特质焦虑缓和(其中转移在基线症状较高的人中最大)。我们讨论了在更大和临床样本中工作的必要性,同时敦促谨慎,这些FIBM训练效果可能不会转移到临床相关领域。
Cognitive bias modification is a potential low-intensity intervention for mood disorders, but previous studies have shown mixed success. This study explored whether facial interpretation bias modification (FIBM), a similar paradigm designed to shift emotional interpretation (and/or perception) of faces would transfer to: (i) self-reported symptoms and (ii) a battery of cognitive tasks. In a preregistered, double-blind randomized controlled trial, healthy participants received eight online sessions of FIBM (N = 52) or eight sham sessions (N = 52). While we replicate that FIBM successfully shifts ambiguous facial expression interpretation in the intervention group, this failed to transfer to the majority of self-report or cognitive measures. There was, however, weak, inconclusive evidence of transfer to a self-report measure of stress, a cognitive measure of anhedonia, and evidence that results were moderated by trait anxiety (whereby transference was greatest in those with higher baseline symptoms). We discuss the need for work in both larger and clinical samples, while urging caution that these FIBM training effects may not transfer to clinically relevant domains.
朝着情感上的“压力测试”:一种可靠的,非主体的认知度量的焦虑响应。
DOI: 10.1038/srep40094
发表时间: 2017-01-10
期刊: Scientific reports
影响因子: 4.6
作者:
Aylward J;Robinson OJ
通讯作者: Robinson OJ
DOI: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2009.09020149
发表时间: 2009-10-01
影响因子: 17.7
作者:
Harmer, Catherine J.;O'Sullivan, Ursula;Cowen, Philip J.
通讯作者: Cowen, Philip J.
DOI: 10.3758/cabn.10.1.50
发表时间: 2010-03-01
影响因子: 2.9
作者:
De Raedt, Rudi;Koster, Ernst H. W.
通讯作者: Koster, Ernst H. W.
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbtep.2010.02.004
发表时间: 2010-09-01
影响因子: 1.8
作者:
Baert, Saskia;De Raedt, Rudi;Koster, Ernst H. W.
通讯作者: Koster, Ernst H. W.
DOI: 10.1037/abn0000049
发表时间: 2015-08
影响因子: 4.6
作者:
Beevers CG;Clasen PC;Enock PM;Schnyer DM
通讯作者: Schnyer DM