Changing delay discounting in the light of the competing neurobehavioral decision systems theory: a review.
Changing delay discounting in the light of the competing neurobehavioral decision systems theory: a review.
复制标题
DOI：
10.1002/jeab.2
复制
发表时间：
2013-01
影响因子：
2.7
通讯作者：
Bickel, Warren K.
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Koffarnus, Mikhail N.;Jarmolowicz, David P.;Mueller, E. Terry;Bickel, Warren K.
延迟增强剂的过度贬值与多种临床症状共同发生，如药物依赖、肥胖和过度赌博。如果过度延迟折扣是导致这些和其他负面健康状况的选择行为的基础，那么改变个人贴现率的努力可以说是重要的。虽然贴现率通常被认为是一个相对稳定的特征，但关于成功改变贴现率的干预和环境操纵的描述已经开始出现在文献中。在这篇综述中，我们比较了已发表的改变贴现率的程序实例，并将它们分类为程序类别，包括治疗干预、对执行决策系统的直接操纵、框架效应、生理状态效应和急性药物效应。贴现率的这些变化是从竞争神经行为决策系统理论的角度来解释的，该理论描述了解释延迟折扣的神经和行为过程的组合。我们还提出了未来研究人员可以采取的方向，以确定允许贴现率变化的机制过程，并测试相互竞争的神经行为决策系统对延迟折扣的看法是否正确。
Excessively devaluing delayed reinforcers co-occurs with a wide variety of clinical conditions such as drug dependence, obesity, and excessive gambling. If excessive delay discounting is a trans-disease process that underlies the choice behavior leading to these and other negative health conditions, efforts to change an individual’s discount rate are arguably important. Although discount rate is often regarded as a relatively stable trait, descriptions of interventions and environmental manipulations that successfully alter discount rate have begun to appear in the literature. In this review, we compare published examples of procedures that change discount rate and classify them into categories of procedures, including therapeutic interventions, direct manipulation of the executive decision-making system, framing effects, physiological state effects, and acute drug effects. These changes in discount rate are interpreted from the perspective of the competing neurobehavioral decision systems theory, which describes a combination of neurological and behavioral processes that account for delay discounting. We also suggest future directions that researchers could take to identify the mechanistic processes that allow for changes in discount rate and to test whether the competing neurobehavioral decision systems view of delay discounting is correct.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子：
3.4
作者：
Bickel, Warren K.;Landes, Reid D.;Christensen, Darren R.;Jackson, Lisa;Jones, Bryan A.;Kurth-Nelson, Zeb;Redish, A. David
通讯作者：
Redish, A. David
影响因子：
2.2
作者：
Bickel WK;Mueller ET
通讯作者：
Mueller ET
影响因子：
13.5
作者：
Bickel, Warren K.;Jarmolowicz, David P.;Mueller, E. Terry;Koffarnus, Mikhail N.;Gatchalian, Kirstin M.
通讯作者：
Gatchalian, Kirstin M.
影响因子：
5.7
作者：
Ballard K;Knutson B
通讯作者：
Knutson B
影响因子：
2.9
作者：
Acheson, Ashley;Richards, Jerry B.;de Wit, Harriet
通讯作者：
de Wit, Harriet