Development of a consensus taxonomy of sedentary behaviors (SIT): report of Delphi Round 1.
Development of a consensus taxonomy of sedentary behaviors (SIT): report of Delphi Round 1.
复制标题
DOI：
10.1371/journal.pone.0082313
复制
发表时间：
2013
期刊：
影响因子：
3.7
通讯作者：
Skelton DA
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Chastin SF;Schwarz U;Skelton DA
在过去的十年中，久坐行为已经成为一种独特的行为模式，对身体活动无关的健康产生有害影响。研究的下一阶段是建立久坐行为和健康结果之间的剂量反应，并提高对这些行为的背景和决定因素的理解。建立这些行为的通用分类是这个过程中的必要步骤。久坐行为国际分类学项目是通过使用正式的共识过程来建立久坐行为的分类。 本研究遵循德尔菲法，分三轮进行。筹备阶段为制定职权范围文件提供了信息。在第一轮中，专家们被要求对分类法进行陈述; 1）它的目的和用途; 2）应该考虑和包括的域，类别或方面; 3）安排和链接这些域和方面的结构/架构。在第二轮中，专家们将收到第一轮产生的分类法草案，并邀请他们提出意见和修改建议。分类法将在本阶段开始时最后确定。第一轮的结果在这里报告。有一个普遍的共识，分类将有助于促进系统化和标准化的研究进展：1）调查和分析; 2）报告和交流; 3）数据汇集，比较和荟萃分析; 4）测量工具的开发; 4）数据描述，导致更高的数据查询质量和促进发现。还有一个共识是，这样的分类法应该是灵活的，以适应不同的使用目的，并在该领域的未来发展，但提供一个跨学科的共同语言。一个共识的分类结构出现了九个主要方面（目的，环境，权力，社会，测量，相关行为，状态，时间，类型）和第二轮的结构草案。
Over the last decade, sedentary behaviors have emerged as a distinctive behavioral paradigm with deleterious effects on health independent of physical activity. The next phase of research is to establish dose response between sedentary behaviors and health outcomes and improve understanding of context and determinants of these behaviors. Establishing a common taxonomy of these behaviors is a necessary step in this process. The Sedentary behavior International Taxonomy project was developed to establish a classification of sedentary behaviors by use of a formal consensus process. The study follows a Delphi process in three Rounds. A preparatory stage informed the development of terms of reference documents. In Round 1, experts were asked to make statements about the taxonomy; 1) its purpose and use ; 2) the domains, categories or facets that should be consider and include; 3) the structure/architecture to arrange and link these domains and facets. In Round 2 experts will be presented with a draft taxonomy emerging from Round 1 and invited to comment and propose alterations. The taxonomy will then be finalised at the outset of this stage. Results of Round 1 are reported here. There is a general consensus that a taxonomy will help advances in research by facilitating systematic and standardised: 1) investigation and analysis; 2) reporting and communication; 3) data pooling, comparison and meta-analysis; 4) development of measurement tools; 4) data descriptions, leading to higher quality in data querying and facilitate discoveries. There is also a consensus that such a taxonomy should be flexible to accommodate diverse purposes of use, and future advances in the field and yet provide a cross-disciplinary common language. A consensual taxonomy structure emerged with nine primary facets (Purpose, Environment, Posture, Social, Measurement, Associated behavior, Status, Time, Type) and the draft structure presented here for Round 2.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子：
16.2
作者：
Dunstan DW;Kingwell BA;Larsen R;Healy GN;Cerin E;Hamilton MT;Shaw JE;Bertovic DA;Zimmet PZ;Salmon J;Owen N
通讯作者：
Owen N
影响因子：
5.7
作者：
Owen N;Healy GN;Matthews CE;Dunstan DW
通讯作者：
Dunstan DW
影响因子：
3.8
作者：
Hasson, F;Keeney, S;McKenna, H
通讯作者：
McKenna, H
影响因子：
7
作者：
Dietz, WH
通讯作者：
Dietz, WH
影响因子：
5.5
作者：
Stamatakis, Emmanuel;Coombs, Ngaire;Padez, Cristina
通讯作者：
Padez, Cristina