Immigration strategies of cities: local growth policies and urban planning in Germany

Immigration strategies of cities: local growth policies and urban planning in Germany
复制标题

城市的移民战略:德国的地方发展战略和城市规划

DOI:
10.1080/09654313.2018.1484428
复制
发表时间:
2018
影响因子:
2.8
通讯作者:
--
中科院分区:
经济学3区
文献类型:
--
作者:

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

移民是决策中最有争议的领域之一,不仅在欧洲和国家层面,而且在地方层面。由于人口减少和老龄化,欧洲城市今天越来越需要移民。另一方面,右翼民粹主义政党正在增加,他们遵循反移民议程。本文探讨了城市在市一级更有效地吸引移民的机会。文献表明,城市不能奉行自己的移民政策,因为它们依赖于国家的移民制度。城市面临着一个困境。他们负责融合移民,但不负责招募移民。城市增长政策和城市规划方法往往旨在吸引高技能工人、创意阶层和学生。但是,城市无法控制难民的流入,因为他们是由国家分配的。在此背景下,本文探讨和比较城市的不莱梅和莱比锡,以评估哪些移民战略德国城市正在发展,以及是否从反应性的整合计划,积极主动的移民政策正在发生转变。在结论中,本文反思了鼓励和阻碍制定移民战略的因素,并解释了地方一级的“战略差距”。
Immigration is one of the most contentious fields in policy-making, not only on the European and national, but also on the local level. Due to the declining and ageing populations, European cities today increasingly need immigration. On the other side, right-wing populist parties are increasing, who are following an anti-migrant agenda. This paper examines the opportunities that cities have to more effectively attract migrants at the municipal level. The literature indicates that cities cannot pursue their own migration policies given their dependence on states’ migration regimes. Cities face a dilemma. They are responsible for integrating migrants but not for recruiting them. Urban growth policies and urban planning approaches often aim to attract highly skilled workers, creative classes and students. But cities have no control over the inflow of refugees, however, as they are allocated by the state. Against this backdrop, this article examines and compares the cities of Bremen and Leipzig to assess which immigration strategies German cities are developing and whether a shift from reactive integration plans to proactive immigration policies is occurring. In the conclusion, the paper reflects on factors that encourage and hinder the formulation of immigration strategies and explain the ‘strategy gap’ at the local level.
DOI: --
发表时间: 2004
期刊:
影响因子: --
作者:
J. Hollifield
通讯作者: J. Hollifield
历史视角下的“地方转向”:英国和德国的两个城市案例研究
DOI: 10.1177/0020852315592466
发表时间: 2017
影响因子: 2.3
作者:
S. Hackett
通讯作者: S. Hackett
国际移民、地区发展不平衡和两极分化
DOI: --
发表时间: 2009
期刊:
影响因子: --
作者:
Allan M. Williams
通讯作者: Allan M. Williams
德国联邦移民和一体化政策中的共产主义运动
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-658-13409-9_5
发表时间: 2018
期刊: ChemMedChem
影响因子: 3.4
作者:
Michael Bommes
通讯作者: Michael Bommes
DOI: --
发表时间: 2014
影响因子: 2.1
作者:
G. Facchini;E. Lodigiani
通讯作者: E. Lodigiani