Regulatory mode preferences for autonomy supporting versus controlling instructional styles.
Regulatory mode preferences for autonomy supporting versus controlling instructional styles.
复制标题
支持自主性与控制性教学风格的监管模式偏好。
DOI:
10.1348/978185409x412444
复制
发表时间:
2009
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
A. Kruglanski
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Antonio Pierro;F. Presaghi;T. Higgins;A. Kruglanski
BACKGROUND
Three studies carried out in educational settings examined determinants of teacher's instructional styles and students' degree of satisfaction with the learning climates created by such styles.
AIMS
Based upon regulatory mode theory, Studies 1 and 2 tested the hypotheses that teachers' locomotion orientation will be positively related, and their assessment orientation will be negatively related, to autonomy supportive (vs. controlling) instructional styles. Study 3 tested the hypothesis that students' regulatory mode will exhibit a fit effect with the prevalent learning climate in their school.
SAMPLES
Participants for Study 1 were 378 teachers (278 females); for Study 2 were 96 teachers (65 females); and for Study 3 were 190 students (all males).
METHOD
Participants completed questionnaires that included measures of teaching styles (Studies 1 and 2), perceived learning climate and satisfaction (Study 3), and regulatory mode orientations (Studies 1 and 3). In Study 2 regulatory mode orientations were experimentally induced.
RESULTS
Results confirmed that teachers' autonomy supportive versus controlling styles were positively related to their locomotion orientations and negatively related to their assessment orientation, and that students with a stronger locomotion (vs. assessment) orientation reported a higher level of satisfaction when the learning climate was perceived as autonomy supportive (vs. controlling).
CONCLUSIONS
The present studies show that teachers' preference for adopting an instructional style is influenced by their regulatory mode orientations, and that the effects of a learning climate on students' satisfaction are contingent on a fit between type of learning climate and students' regulatory mode orientations.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子:
7.6
作者:
A. Kruglanski;E. P. Thompson;E. Higgins;M. N. Atash;Antonio Pierro;J. Shah;Scott Spiegel
通讯作者:
A. Kruglanski;E. P. Thompson;E. Higgins;M. N. Atash;Antonio Pierro;J. Shah;Scott Spiegel
影响因子:
7.6
作者:
RYAN, RM;CONNELL, JP
通讯作者:
CONNELL, JP
影响因子:
7.6
作者:
GROLNICK, WS;RYAN, RM
通讯作者:
RYAN, RM
影响因子:
7.6
作者:
Williams, GC;Deci, EL
通讯作者:
Deci, EL
影响因子:
16.4
作者:
Higgins, ET
通讯作者:
Higgins, ET