Recognition, remember-know, and confidence judgments: no evidence of cross-contamination here!
Recognition, remember-know, and confidence judgments: no evidence of cross-contamination here!
复制标题
识别、记住知道和置信度判断：这里没有交叉污染的证据！
DOI：
10.1080/09658211.2023.2207804
复制
发表时间：
2023
期刊：
影响因子：
2.1
通讯作者：
Williams H
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Williams H
我们报告了三个实验，旨在通过检查如何测量这些经验的影响来揭示识别的主观经验的基础机制。先前的研究已经探索了收集元认知测量对记忆表现的潜在影响。在这项工作的基础上，我们系统地评估了在旧/新识别决策之后做出记忆-知道（RK）和/或信心(C)判断时是否会发生交叉测量污染。在实验1中，相对于标准的无判断条件，做出RK或C判断对识别没有显著影响。在实验2中，除了做出C判断外，还做出RK判断对认知和信心没有显著影响。在实验3中，除了做出RK判断外，还做出C判断对RK反应的识别和模式没有显著影响。交叉污染并不明显，无论项目是使用浅层还是深层处理任务进行研究——这种操作对识别、RK判断和c产生了强大的影响。我们的研究结果表明，在某些条件下，参与者可以独立评估他们的识别、主观识别经验和信心。尽管元内存和内存测量之间的污染总是可能的，但它可能不是不可避免的。这暗示了伴随识别判断的主观经验的机制。
We report three experiments designed to reveal the mechanisms that underlie subjective experiences of recognition by examining effects of how those experiences are measured. Prior research has explored the potential influences of collecting metacognitive measures on memory performance. Building on this work, here we systematically evaluated whether cross-measure contamination occurs when remember-know (RK) and/or confidence (C) judgments are made after old/new recognition decisions. In Experiment 1, making either RK or C judgments did not significantly influence recognition relative to a standard no-judgment condition. In Experiment 2, making RK judgments in addition to C judgments did not significantly affect recognition or confidence. In Experiment 3, making C judgments in addition to RK judgments did not significantly affect recognition or patterns of RK responses. Cross-contamination was not apparent regardless of whether items were studied using a shallow or deep levels-of-processing task – a manipulation that yielded robust effects on recognition, RK judgments, and C. Our results indicate that under some conditions, participants can independently evaluate their recognition, subjective recognition experience, and confidence. Though contamination across measures of metamemory and memory is always possible, it may not be inevitable. This has implications for the mechanisms that underlie subjective experiences that accompany recognition judgments.
登录
查看更多内容
面对记忆和认知的有效性：参与者和研究人员之间的经验共识和分歧
影响因子：
12.6
作者：
S. Umanath;J. Coane
通讯作者：
J. Coane
你从记忆中得到什么取决于你提出的问题。
DOI：
10.1037/0278-7393.29.5.797
发表时间：
2003
期刊：
Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition
影响因子：
--
作者：
M. Humphreys;S. Dennis;Angela M. Maguire;Kelly L. Reynolds;Scott Bolland;J. D. Hughes
通讯作者：
J. D. Hughes
记忆过程的测量如何影响记忆性能：记住/知道判断的情况。
DOI：
10.1037/a0025256
发表时间：
2012
期刊：
Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition
影响因子：
--
作者：
M. Naveh;Angela Kilb
通讯作者：
Angela Kilb
影响因子：
3.5
作者：
Rotello, CM;Macmillan, NA;Wong, M
通讯作者：
Wong, M
环境的影响
DOI：
10.3233/iks-2012-0188
发表时间：
2011
期刊：
Inf. Knowl. Syst. Manag.
影响因子：
--
作者：
S. Mumford;R. Anjum
通讯作者：
R. Anjum