Face Validity of Remembering and Knowing: Empirical Consensus and Disagreement Between Participants and Researchers
Face Validity of Remembering and Knowing: Empirical Consensus and Disagreement Between Participants and Researchers
复制标题
面对记忆和认知的有效性：参与者和研究人员之间的经验共识和分歧
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2020
影响因子：
12.6
通讯作者：
J. Coane
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
S. Umanath;J. Coane
自从恩德尔·图尔文首次区分情景记忆和语义记忆以来，记忆/知道范式已成为记忆研究人员、神经心理学家、神经科学家和其他人探索参与者记忆体验现象学的标准方法。然而，这种范式并非没有问题，并且已被用来捕捉许多不同的现象学经验，包括情景记忆与语义记忆的检索、回忆与熟悉度、记忆痕迹的强度等等。我们首先对它在文献中的用途进行了系统回顾，然后研究了记忆专家、其他认知心理学专家、其他心理学领域的专家以及外行参与者（亚马逊 Mechanical Turk 工作人员）如何定义人们说“我记得”和“我知道”时的含义。从使用许多理论约束维度对他们的开放式反应进行编码来看，外行参与者似乎与记忆专家在将“我记得”反应与回忆联系起来以及将“我知道”反应与熟悉程度联系起来方面意见不一致。然而，人们普遍认同图尔文最初的区分，将记忆与事件记忆联系起来，将认知与语义记忆联系起来。讨论了跨领域的建议和影响。
Ever since Endel Tulving first distinguished between episodic and semantic memory, the remember/know paradigm has become a standard means of probing the phenomenology of participants’ memorial experiences by memory researchers, neuropsychologists, neuroscientists, and others. However, this paradigm has not been without its problems and has been used to capture many different phenomenological experiences, including retrieval from episodic versus semantic memory, recollection versus familiarity, strength of memory traces, and so on. We first conducted a systematic review of its uses across the literature and then examined how memory experts, other cognitive psychology experts, experts in other areas of psychology, and lay participants (Amazon Mechanical Turk workers) define what it means when one says “I remember” and “I know.” From coding their open-ended responses using a number of theory-bound dimensions, it seems that lay participants do not see eye to eye with memory experts in terms of associating “I remember” responses with recollection and “I know” responses with familiarity. However, there is general consensus with Tulving’s original distinction, linking remembering with memory for events and knowing with semantic memory. Recommendations and implications across fields are discussed.
登录
查看更多内容
非标准记忆在估计记忆和熟悉度中的作用。
影响因子：
4.3
作者：
Parks,ColleenM
通讯作者：
Parks,ColleenM
DOI：
--
发表时间：
1987
期刊：
Human neurobiology
影响因子：
--
作者：
E. Tulving
通讯作者：
E. Tulving
DOI：
10.1037/0278-7393.26.4.1070
发表时间：
2000-07
期刊：
Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition
影响因子：
--
作者：
S. Rajaram;Lisa Geraci
通讯作者：
S. Rajaram;Lisa Geraci
影响因子：
2.4
作者：
McDaniel, Mark A.;Shelton, Jill Talley;Breneiser, Jennifer E.;Moynan, Sarah;Balota, David A.
通讯作者：
Balota, David A.
DOI：
--
发表时间：
2013
期刊：
--
影响因子：
--
作者：
Diana Selmeczy;I. Dobbins
通讯作者：
Diana Selmeczy;I. Dobbins