Cognitive parallels between moral judgment and modal judgment
Cognitive parallels between moral judgment and modal judgment
复制标题
道德判断和模态判断之间的认知相似之处
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2013
影响因子：
3.5
通讯作者：
Lester C Tong
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Andrew Shtulman;Lester C Tong
道德心理学研究的一个核心问题是，在道德判断的生成过程中，直接的直觉如何与更深思熟虑的深思熟虑相互作用。本研究通过比较成年人对道德允许性的判断与对物理可能性的判断——一种还涉及直觉和深思熟虑协调的判断形式（Shtulman，Cognitive Development 24：293-309，2009），进一步阐明了这个问题。参与者（N = 146）被要求判断 16 种非同寻常的行为的允许性（例如，道德上是否允许 80 岁的女性与 20 岁的男性发生性关系？）以及 16 种非同寻常的事件的可能性（例如，人类是否有可能使灭绝的物种复活？）。即使在控制厌恶敏感度的情况下，他们判断异常事件是否可能的倾向也预示着他们判断异常行为是否允许的倾向。此外，参与者的理由和响应延迟模式在各个领域之间是相关的。总的来说，这些发现表明，模态判断和道德判断可能通过共同的推理策略联系起来，一些人关注为什么不发生的行为/事件不会发生，而另一些人则关注这些相同的行为/事件如何发生。
A central question in the study of moral psychology is how immediate intuition interacts with more thoughtful deliberation in the generation of moral judgments. The present study sheds additional light on this question by comparing adults’ judgments of moral permissibility with their judgments of physical possibility—a form of judgment that also involves the coordination of intuition and deliberation (Shtulman, Cognitive Development 24:293–309, 2009). Participants (N = 146) were asked to judge the permissibility of 16 extraordinary actions (e.g., Is it ever morally permissible for an 80-year-old woman to have sex with a 20-year-old man?) and the possibility of 16 extraordinary events (e.g., Will it ever be physically possible for humans to bring an extinct species back to life?). Their tendency to judge the extraordinary events as possible was predictive of their tendency to judge the extraordinary actions as permissible, even when controlling for disgust sensitivity. Moreover, participants’ justification and response latency patterns were correlated across domains. Taken together, these findings suggest that modal judgment and moral judgment may be linked by a common inference strategy, with some individuals focusing on why actions/events that do not occur cannot occur, and others focusing on how those same actions/events could occur.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子：
4.6
作者：
Woolley JD;E Ghossainy M
通讯作者：
E Ghossainy M
影响因子：
5.4
作者：
J. Haidt
通讯作者：
J. Haidt
儿童关于社会、身体和逻辑规律的推理：看两个世界。
影响因子：
4.6
作者：
Komatsu,LK;Galotti,KM
通讯作者：
Galotti,KM
影响因子：
7.6
作者：
HAIDT, J;KOLLER, SH;DIAS, MG
通讯作者：
DIAS, MG