How to handle anxiety: The effects of reappraisal, acceptance, and suppression strategies on anxious arousal.
How to handle anxiety: The effects of reappraisal, acceptance, and suppression strategies on anxious arousal.
复制标题
DOI：
10.1016/j.brat.2009.02.010
复制
发表时间：
2009-05
影响因子：
4.1
通讯作者：
Asnaani A
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Hofmann SG;Heering S;Sawyer AT;Asnaani A
有人认为，在调节情绪方面，重新评估策略比抑制策略更有效。最近，基于接受的行为治疗运动的支持者进一步强调了基于接受的情绪调节技术的重要性。为了直接比较这些不同的情绪调节策略，202 名志愿者被要求在摄像机前进行即兴演讲。参与者被随机分配到三组中的一组。重新评估小组被指示通过重新评估情况来调节他们的焦虑情绪；压制小组被要求压制他们的焦虑行为；接受组被要求接受他们的焦虑。正如预期的那样，与重新评估组和接受组相比，抑制组的心率较基线有更大的增加。此外，抑制组比重新评估组报告了更多的焦虑。然而，接受组和抑制组的主观焦虑反应没有差异。这些结果表明，重新评估和接受焦虑对于缓解生理唤醒比抑制焦虑更有效。然而，重新评估对于缓解主观焦虑感比试图抑制或接受焦虑感更有效。
It has been suggested that reappraisal strategies are more effective than suppression strategies for regulating emotions. Recently, proponents of the acceptance-based behavior therapy movement have further emphasized the importance of acceptance-based emotion regulation techniques. In order to directly compare these different emotion regulation strategies, 202 volunteers were asked to give an impromptu speech in front of a video camera. Participants were randomly assigned to one of three groups. The Reappraisal group was instructed to regulate their anxious arousal by reappraising the situation; the Suppression group was asked to suppress their anxious behaviors; and the Acceptance group was instructed to accept their anxiety. As expected, the Suppression group showed a greater increase in heart rate from baseline than the Reappraisal and Acceptance groups. Moreover, the Suppression group reported more anxiety than the Reappraisal group. However, the Acceptance and Suppression groups did not differ in their subjective anxiety response. These results suggest that both reappraising and accepting anxiety is more effective for moderating the physiological arousal than suppressing anxiety. However, reappraising is more effective for moderating the subjective feeling of anxiety than attempts to suppress or accept it.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子：
3.7
作者：
HEIMBERG, RG;MUELLER, GP;LIEBOWITZ, MR
通讯作者：
LIEBOWITZ, MR
影响因子：
7.6
作者：
CIOFFI, D;HOLLOWAY, J
通讯作者：
HOLLOWAY, J
影响因子：
4.3
作者：
Mackinnon, A;Jorm, AF;Rodgers, B
通讯作者：
Rodgers, B
影响因子：
4.1
作者：
Campbell-Sills, Laura;Barlow, David H.;Hofmann, Stefan G.
通讯作者：
Hofmann, Stefan G.
影响因子：
10.6
作者：
Davidson, RJ;Marshall, JR;Henriques, JB
通讯作者：
Henriques, JB