What is a processing speed weakness? Importance of cognitive ability when defining processing speed in a child psychiatric population.
What is a processing speed weakness? Importance of cognitive ability when defining processing speed in a child psychiatric population.
复制标题
什么是处理速度弱点?在定义儿童精神病人群中定义加工速度时的认知能力的重要性。
DOI:
10.1080/09297049.2021.1972957
复制
发表时间:
2022-03
影响因子:
2.2
通讯作者:
Braaten, E. B.
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Forchelli, G. A.;Vuijk, P. J.;Colvin, M. K.;Ward, A. K.;Koven, M. R.;Dews, A.;Doyle, A. E.;Braaten, E. B.
There is growing evidence that processing speed (PS) deficits in youth with neuropsychiatric conditions are associated with functional difficulties. However, there is no consistent definition of slower PS; specifically, whether slower PS should be defined as a discrepancy from same-aged peers (normative weakness) or as an intrapersonal deficit relative to overall cognitive ability (relative weakness). In a sample of clinically-referred youth, we calculated slower PS both ways and examined the impact on adaptive, academic, and psychopathology outcomes in relation to different levels of cognitive ability. Significant PS x cognitive ability interactions were found on adaptive and academic outcomes. A norm-based weakness in PS (PSI Standard Score <85) was associated with lower adaptive skills and lower academic skills regardless of cognitive ability. In the above average cognitive ability group, relatively lower PS (PSI<15 point difference from VCI) was associated with significantly lower academic performance. No significant associations were found for general psychopathology. Results suggest a normative weakness in PS impacts functional outcomes interactively and differently with level of general cognitive ability. Data suggest that higher cognitive ability may be somewhat protective from the impact of normatively weak PS on adaptive outcomes; however, youth across all abilities with normatively weak PS showed weaker academic performance. Second, children with high cognitive abilities and relatively weak PS showed discrepant performance compared to comparison group. Implications and areas for future research are discussed.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子:
3.6
作者:
Santegoeds, E.;van Der Schoot, E.;Roording-Ragetlie, S.;Klip, H.;Rommelse, N.
通讯作者:
Rommelse, N.
DOI:
10.1080/09297049.2010.485126
发表时间:
2010
期刊:
Child neuropsychology : a journal on normal and abnormal development in childhood and adolescence
影响因子:
--
作者:
Goth-Owens TL;Martinez-Torteya C;Martel MM;Nigg JT
通讯作者:
Nigg JT
影响因子:
3
作者:
Moll, Kristina;Goebel, Silke M.;Snowling, Margaret J.
通讯作者:
Snowling, Margaret J.
影响因子:
3.6
作者:
Shanahan, Michelle A.;Pennington, Bruce F.;DeFries, John C.
通讯作者:
DeFries, John C.
影响因子:
3.8
作者:
Thorsen AL;Meza J;Hinshaw S;Lundervold AJ
通讯作者:
Lundervold AJ