How (not) to draw philosophical implications from the cognitive nature of concepts: the case of intentionality.
How (not) to draw philosophical implications from the cognitive nature of concepts: the case of intentionality.
复制标题
DOI：
10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00799
复制
发表时间：
2014
影响因子：
3.8
通讯作者：
Ota K
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Iijima K;Ota K
哲学家经常在各种思想实验中诉诸直觉判断来支持或反对特定的论点。实验哲学是一门新兴的学科，研究这种直觉判断的认知本质。在本文中，我们评估了实验哲学的方法论和认识论地位。我们关注的是Knobe效应，即我们对行为的意向性的直觉判断似乎取决于该行为的感知道德地位。关于Knobe效应的哲学含义的争论是根据意向性概念的能力和表现之间的区别来进行的。一些学者似乎认为，Knobe效应反映了意向性概念的能力（或表现错误）。然而，我们认为这些概念纯粹是功能性的，因此没有哲学含义，没有假设规范主义，我们认为这在心理学方法论中是有问题的。最后，针对能力与理性之间的差距，提出了实验哲学的未来发展方向。
Philosophers have often appealed to intuitive judgments in various thought experiments to support or reject particular theses. Experimental philosophy is an emerging discipline that examines the cognitive nature of such intuitive judgments. In this paper, we assess the methodological and epistemological status of experimental philosophy. We focus on the Knobe effect, in which our intuitive judgment of the intentionality of an action seems to depend on the perceived moral status of that action. The debate on the philosophical implications of the Knobe effect has been framed in terms of the distinction between the competence and performance of the concept of intentionality. Some scholars seem to suggest that the Knobe effect reflects the competence (or otherwise, the performance error) of the concept of intentionality. However, we argue that these notions are purely functional and thus do not have philosophical implications, without assuming normativism, which we see as problematic in a psychological methodology. Finally, focusing on the gap between competence and rationality, we suggest future directions for experimental philosophy.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子：
1.6
作者：
Adams, F;Steadman, A
通讯作者：
Steadman, A
影响因子：
2.5
作者：
Kinno, Ryuta;Muragaki, Yoshihiro;Sakai, Kuniyoshi L.
通讯作者：
Sakai, Kuniyoshi L.
影响因子：
2
作者：
Leslie, Alan M.;Mallon, Ron;DiCorcia, Jennifer A.
通讯作者：
DiCorcia, Jennifer A.
影响因子：
4.6
作者：
HAPPE, FGE
通讯作者：
HAPPE, FGE
影响因子：
1.6
作者：
Knobe, J
通讯作者：
Knobe, J