On the role of inhibition in suppression-induced forgetting.
On the role of inhibition in suppression-induced forgetting.
复制标题
关于抑制在抑制引起的遗忘中的作用。
DOI：
10.1038/s41598-023-31063-3
复制
发表时间：
2023-03-14
影响因子：
4.6
通讯作者：
Anderson, Michael C.
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
van Schie, Kevin;Fawcett, Jonathan M.;Anderson, Michael C.
抑制对不想要的记忆的检索会导致遗忘，这一结果通常归因于抑制控制的招募。这种抑制诱导遗忘（SIF）可以概括为用于测试被抑制内容的不同线索（线索独立性），这一特性被认为与抑制一致。但是线索独立遗忘是否一定意味着记忆被抑制了呢？Tomlinson等人（Proc Natl Acad Sci 106:15588-15593, 2009）报告了一个令人惊讶的发现，即按下按钮也会导致线索独立遗忘，这被认为是另一种干扰说的支持。在此，我们研究了由于检索抑制和按键而导致的遗忘中的抑制作用。我们修改了Tomlinson等人的程序，以检验他们在实验中引入的一个可能导致记忆抑制效应的不寻常特征：显性任务线索的遗漏。当任务没有被提示时，我们复制了按下按钮后的遗忘效应；但当提示时，按下按钮不会导致遗忘。此外，按钮遗忘部分反映了测试时的输出干扰效应，而不是干扰的持久效应。相反，无论这些程序变化如何，SIF都会发生。总的来说，这些发现表明，简单地按下按钮本身并不会导致遗忘，没有引入抑制的混杂因素，而抑制可能是SIF的基础。
Suppressing retrieval of unwanted memories can cause forgetting, an outcome often attributed to the recruitment of inhibitory control. This suppression-induced forgetting (SIF) generalizes to different cues used to test the suppressed content (cue-independence), a property taken as consistent with inhibition. But does cue-independent forgetting necessarily imply that a memory has been inhibited? Tomlinson et al. (Proc Natl Acad Sci 106:15588–15593, 2009) reported a surprising finding that pressing a button also led to cue-independent forgetting, which was taken as support for an alternative interference account. Here we investigated the role of inhibition in forgetting due to retrieval suppression and pressing buttons. We modified Tomlinson et al.’s procedure to examine an unusual feature they introduced that may have caused memory inhibition effects in their experiment: the omission of explicit task-cues. When tasks were uncued, we replicated the button-press forgetting effect; but when cued, pressing buttons caused no forgetting. Moreover, button-press forgetting partially reflects output-interference effects at test and not a lasting effect of interference. In contrast, SIF occurred regardless of these procedural changes. Collectively, these findings indicate that simply pressing a button does not induce forgetting, on its own, without confounding factors that introduce inhibition into the task and that inhibition likely underlies SIF.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子：
64.8
作者：
Anderson, MC;Green, C
通讯作者：
Green, C
影响因子：
5.7
作者：
Bergstroem, Zara M.;de Fockert, Jan W.;Richardson-Klavehn, Alan
通讯作者：
Richardson-Klavehn, Alan
影响因子：
19.9
作者：
Anderson, Michael C.;Hanslmayr, Simon
通讯作者：
Hanslmayr, Simon
影响因子：
8.2
作者：
Catarino A;Küpper CS;Werner-Seidler A;Dalgleish T;Anderson MC
通讯作者：
Anderson MC
DOI：
10.1007/978-1-4614-1195-6_3
发表时间：
2012-01-01
期刊：
TRUE AND FALSE RECOVERED MEMORIES: TOWARD A RECONCILIATION OF THE DEBATE
影响因子：
--
作者：
Anderson, Michael C.;Huddleston, Ean
通讯作者：
Huddleston, Ean