Scaffolding across the lifespan in history-dependent decision-making.
Scaffolding across the lifespan in history-dependent decision-making.
复制标题
依赖历史的决策在整个生命周期中的脚手架。
DOI:
10.1037/a0032717
复制
发表时间:
2013
影响因子:
3.7
通讯作者:
Maddox,WTodd
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Cooper,JessicaA;Worthy,DarrellA;Gorlick,MarissaA;Maddox,WTodd
We examined the relationship between pressure and age-related changes in decision-making using a task for which currently available rewards depend on the participant’s previous history of choices. Optimal responding in this task requires the participant to learn how his or her current choices affect changes in the future rewards given for each option. Building on the scaffolding theory of aging and cognition, we predicted that when additional frontal resources are available, compensatory recruitment leads to increased monitoring and increased use of heuristic-based strategies, ultimately leading to better performance. Specifically, we predicted that scaffolding would result in an age-related performance advantage under no pressure conditions. We also predicted that, although younger adults would engage in scaffolding under pressure, older adults would not have additional resources available for increased scaffolding under pressure-packed conditions, leading to an age-related performance deficit. Both predictions were supported by the data. In addition, computational models were used to evaluate decision-making strategies employed by each participant group. As expected, older adults under no pressure conditions and younger adults under pressure conditions showed increased use of heuristic-based strategies relative to older adults under pressure and younger adults under no pressure, respectively. These results are consistent with the notion that scaffolding can occur across the life span in the face of an environmental challenge.(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved)
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子:
24.8
作者:
Park DC;Reuter-Lorenz P
通讯作者:
Reuter-Lorenz P
影响因子:
8.2
作者:
Beilock, SL;Carr, TH
通讯作者:
Carr, TH
影响因子:
6.8
作者:
AKAIKE, H
通讯作者:
AKAIKE, H
影响因子:
3.4
作者:
Jacoby, LL
通讯作者:
Jacoby, LL
影响因子:
3.7
作者:
Henninger, Debra E.;Madden, David J.;Huettel, Scott A.
通讯作者:
Huettel, Scott A.