Alternate versions of a fixed-choice, delay-discounting assessment for repeated-measures designs.
Alternate versions of a fixed-choice, delay-discounting assessment for repeated-measures designs.
复制标题
用于重复测量设计的固定选择延迟贴现评估的替代版本。
DOI:
10.1037/pha0000211
复制
发表时间:
2018
影响因子:
2.3
通讯作者:
Yi,Richard
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Kuang,Jinyi;Milhorn,Hannah;Stuppy-Sullivan,Allison;Jung,Soyeon;Yi,Richard
Delay discounting, reflected in the tendency to prefer immediate rewards over delayed rewards, is associated with most forms of problematic substance use. When assessed multiple times to examine within-individual changes, for example, following acute drug administration or an intervention, shifts in delay discounting simply because of repeated assessment is a concern, particularly when the assessment task is identical. This may be true for the Monetary Choice Questionnaire (MCQ), a widely used, fixed-item assessment of delay discounting. The present research examined possible within-individual difference/equivalence of MCQ indices at test/retest. This was contrasted with within-individual difference/equivalence when using an alternate version of the MCQ at retest, specifically developed to maintain the assessment structure and scoring of the original MCQ but with different choice items. Eighty-four participants completed delay discounting at test and retest with a 1-week interval; participants were randomized to complete the MCQ at both test and retest (MCQ/MCQ; n= 43) or complete the MCQ at test and an alternate version of the MCQ at retest (MCQ/MCQ-A; n= 41). Conventional hypothesis testing indicated no significant changes in delay discounting in the MCQ/MCQ condition or MCQ/MCQ-A condition. However, equivalence analysis, which is able to established whether scores are statistically equivalent, indicated that test/retest scores were not equivalent in some cases. Specifically, only 1 magnitude in the MCQ/MCQ condition was equivalent at test/retest, whereas 2 magnitudes in the MCQ/MCQ-A condition were equivalent at test/retest.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子:
2
作者:
C. Gopalan
通讯作者:
C. Gopalan
影响因子:
2.9
作者:
M. Neuhäuser;P. Fürst
通讯作者:
P. Fürst
DOI:
--
发表时间:
1979
期刊:
Journal of NutriLife
影响因子:
--
作者:
E. A. Oddoye;S. Margen
通讯作者:
S. Margen
DOI:
10.1152/jappl.1989.66.1.370
发表时间:
1989
期刊:
Journal of applied physiology (Bethesda, Md. : 1985)
影响因子:
--
作者:
Motil,KJ;Montandon,CM;Hachey,DL;Boutton,TW;Klein,PD;Garza,C
通讯作者:
Garza,C
DOI:
--
发表时间:
1973
期刊:
Journal of NutriLife
影响因子:
--
作者:
G. Inoue;Y. Fujita;Y. Niiyama
通讯作者:
Y. Niiyama