Structural drivers of sustainability and resilience strategies in small(ish) cities: a text analysis of comprehensive planning in Indiana
Structural drivers of sustainability and resilience strategies in small(ish) cities: a text analysis of comprehensive planning in Indiana
复制标题
小城市可持续性和复原力战略的结构驱动因素：印第安纳州综合规划的文本分析
DOI：
10.1080/09640568.2023.2240951
复制
发表时间：
2023
影响因子：
3.9
通讯作者：
Stokan, Eric
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Deslatte, Aaron;Chung, Juwon;Stokan, Eric
几十年来，世界上最大、最具全球影响力的城市一直承诺通过不断扩大的计划生态来应对气候变化、韧性、可持续发展和社会不公正。对于较小社区正在发生的事情，人们了解的要少得多。这项研究采用了机构视角和自动化文本分析，考察了许多国家用来指导大都市地区发展的空间分布的地方土地利用计划中嵌入的复原力和可持续性“共享战略”。我们发现，有证据表明，受教育程度较高、种族多样性较少的社区更关注其规划中的“生活质量”便利设施，例如行人资源和环境便利设施。相比之下，种族更多元化的社区更关注绿色雨水基础设施，以解决洪水问题。规划“质量”与设施的关注度呈负相关。综上所述，这些发现表明，全面的土地利用规划既是反映排他性的一种手段，也是追求与特定复原力或可持续发展主题相关的社区需求或目标的一种手段。
For decades, the world’s largest and most globally significant cities have been pledging to tackle climate change, resilience, sustainable development and social injustices through a proliferating ecology of plans. Far less is understood about what is happening in smaller communities. This study employs an institutional lens and automated text analysis to examine the resilience and sustainability “shared strategies” embedded in local land-use plans, which are used in many countries to guide the spatial distribution of development in metropolitan regions. We find evidence that communities that are more highly educated and less racially diverse focus more on “quality of life” amenities within their plans, such as pedestrian resources and environmental amenities. By contrast, communities that are more racially diverse focus greater attention on green stormwater infrastructure to address flooding. Plan “quality” is negatively associated with an amenities’ focus. Taken together, these findings suggest comprehensive land-use planning is both a means for reflecting exclusivity as well as pursuing community needs or goals related to specific resilience or sustainability themes.
登录
查看更多内容
地方政府互动的宏观决定因素
影响因子：
2.1
作者：
R. Hendrick;Yu Shi
通讯作者：
Yu Shi
通过城市供水系统的制度语法评估可持续性
影响因子：
3.8
作者：
Deslatte, Aaron;Helmke‐Long, Laura;Anderies, John M.;Garcia, Margaret;Hornberger, George M.;Ann Koebele, Elizabeth
通讯作者：
Ann Koebele, Elizabeth
社会生态系统的稳健性：对公共政策的影响
影响因子：
3.8
作者：
J. Anderies;M. Janssen
通讯作者：
M. Janssen
影响因子：
3.8
作者：
Saba Siddiki;Tanya Heikkila;C. Weible;Raul Pacheco‐Vega;D. P. Carter;Cali Curley;A. Deslatte;A. Bennett
通讯作者：
A. Bennett
象征性政策还是实质性政策？
DOI：
10.1068/c09185
发表时间：
2011
期刊：
Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy
影响因子：
--
作者：
Rachel M. Krause
通讯作者：
Rachel M. Krause