Assessing the Role of DNA Methylation-Derived Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio in Rheumatoid Arthritis.
Assessing the Role of DNA Methylation-Derived Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio in Rheumatoid Arthritis.
复制标题
DOI:
10.1155/2018/2624981
复制
发表时间:
2018
影响因子:
4.1
通讯作者:
Relton CL
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Ambatipudi S;Sharp GC;Clarke SLN;Plant D;Tobias JH;Evans DM;Barton A;Relton CL
Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a disease of chronic systemic inflammation (SI). In the present study, we used four datasets to explore whether methylation-derived neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (mdNLR) might be a marker of SI in new onset, untreated, and treated prevalent RA cases and/or a marker of treatment response to the tumour necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi) etanercept. mdNLR was associated with increased odds of being a new onset RA case (OR = 2.32, 95% CI = 1.95–2.80, P < 2 × 10−16) and performed better in distinguishing new onset RA cases from controls compared to covariates: age, gender, and smoking status. In untreated preclinical RA cases and controls, mdNLR at baseline was associated with diagnosis of RA in later life after adjusting for batch (OR = 4.30, 95% CI = 1.52–21.71, P = 0.029) although no association was observed before batch correction. When prevalent RA cases were treated, there was no association with mdNLR in samples before and after batch correction (OR = 0.34, 95% CI = 0.05–1.82, P = 0.23), and mdNLR was not associated with treatment response to etanercept (OR = 1.10, 95% CI = 0.75–1.68, P = 0.64). Our results indicate that SI measured by DNA methylation data is indicative of the recent onset of RA. Although preclinical RA was associated with mdNLR, there was no difference in the mean mdNLR between preclinical RA cases and controls. mdNLR was not associated with RA case status if treatment for RA has commenced, and it is not associated with treatment response. In the future, mdNLR estimates may be used as a valuable research tool to reliably estimate SI in the absence of freshly collected blood samples.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子:
12.3
作者:
McGregor K;Bernatsky S;Colmegna I;Hudson M;Pastinen T;Labbe A;Greenwood CM
通讯作者:
Greenwood CM
影响因子:
2.9
作者:
Pan L;Du J;Li T;Liao H
通讯作者:
Liao H
影响因子:
2.7
作者:
Mercan, Ridvan;Bitik, Berivan;Goker, Berna
通讯作者:
Goker, Berna
影响因子:
4.2
作者:
Kisacik, Bunyamin;Tufan, Abdurrahman;Calguneri, Meral
通讯作者:
Calguneri, Meral
影响因子:
3.7
作者:
Glossop, John R.;Emes, Richard D.;Farrell, William E.
通讯作者:
Farrell, William E.