Strategies for Coping With Stress Used by Nurses in Poland and Belarus During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Strategies for Coping With Stress Used by Nurses in Poland and Belarus During the COVID-19 Pandemic.
复制标题

DOI:
10.3389/fpsyt.2022.867148
复制
发表时间:
2022
影响因子:
4.7
通讯作者:
Sobolewski, Marek
Sobolewski, Marek
中科院分区:
医学3区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Kowalczuk, Krystyna;Shpakou, Andrei;Hermanowicz, Justyna M.;Krajewska-Kulak, Elzbieta;Sobolewski, Marek

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

压力是护士工作中不可分割的因素。它也是健康失调的原因和各种疾病的根源。护士的幸福和健康直接影响到护理质量和患者的健康结果。适当的压力应对策略可以减少压力的影响,减轻其负面后果。COVID-19大流行,尤其是在其初期,为护士带来了巨大的额外压力。在波兰和白俄罗斯:作为两个有着共同历史和相似文化的邻国,当局采取了完全不同的方法来对抗COVID-19大流行。本研究的目的是调查和比较波兰和白俄罗斯的护士在COVID-19大流行期间如何科普压力。这项横断面研究在波兰比亚韦斯托克(158人)和白俄罗斯格罗德诺(126人)的284名医院护士中进行。Mini-Cope量表-卡弗的BriefCope的波兰版,用于测量应对压力的能力。只有17.5%的白俄罗斯护士接受了病毒检测,只有4.8%的护士被感染,而在波兰,这一比例分别为50.6%和31.0%。在这两个国家,最常用的应对策略是积极的策略(积极应对,计划)和最少使用的是回避策略(行为脱离,物质使用)。波兰护士显着更经常比白俄罗斯寻求支持/情绪导向的策略,以及回避策略。两组之间的积极应对策略没有差异。接触感染SARS-CoV 2病毒的患者并不影响两国护士对压力应对策略的选择。留在隔离或居家隔离有利于更积极的应对策略,特别是在白俄罗斯护士的情况。采取SARS-CoV-2测试没有统计学差异的应对策略在白俄罗斯组的选择。在波兰组中,SARS-CoV-2检测结果呈阳性的护士使用工具支持和情感支持策略的频率较低。SARS-CoV-2病毒感染在波兰组中没有统计学差异。波兰和白俄罗斯的护士在面对COVID-19大流行时使用了类似的策略来科普压力。波兰和白俄罗斯护士之间的社会和人口差异在更大程度上区分了受访者对应对策略的选择,而不是媒体和当局对两国COVID-19大流行的完全不同的方法。COVID-19大流行的威胁并没有影响波兰和白俄罗斯护士应对压力策略的选择。被隔离或居家隔离有利于白俄罗斯护士使用积极的应对策略。另一方面,波兰护士在被隔离后更有可能转向宗教。
Stress is an inseparable element of nurses' work. It is also the cause of wellbeing disorders and the source of various diseases. The wellbeing and health of nurses has a direct impact on the quality of care and health outcomes for patients. An appropriate stress coping strategy can reduce the impact of stress and mitigate its negative consequences. The COVID-19 pandemic, especially in its initial period, was a source of enormous additional stress for nurses. In Poland and Belarus: two neighboring countries with common history and similar culture, the authorities took a completely different approach to fighting the COVID-19 pandemic. The purpose of this study was to investigate and compare how nurses in Poland and Belarus cope with stress during the COVID-19 pandemic. The cross-sectional study was conducted among 284 nurses working in hospital in Bialystok, Poland (158) and in Grodno, Belarus (126). Mini-Cope inventory - the polish adaptation of Carver's BriefCope was used for measuring coping with stress. Only 17.5% of Belarusian nurses were tested for the presence of the virus and only 4.8% were infected, while in Poland it was 50.6 and 31.0%, respectively. The most frequent used coping strategies were active strategies (active coping, planning) and the least-used were avoidance strategies (behavioral disengagement, substance use) in both countries. Polish nurses significantly more often than Belorussian used support-seeking/emotion-oriented strategies, as well as avoidance strategies. No differences were found for active coping strategies between the both groups. Contact with a patient infected with the SARS-CoV2 virus did not influence the choice of stress coping strategies by nurses in both countries. Staying in quarantine or home isolation favored more active coping strategies, especially in the case of Belarusian nurses. Taking a SARS-CoV-2 test did not statistically differentiate the choice of coping strategies in the Belarusian group. In the Polish group, nurses with a positive SARS-CoV-2 test result used both use of instrumental support and use of emotional support strategies less frequently. SARS-CoV-2 virus infection did not statistically differentiated how stressful situations were handled in Polish group. Polish and Belorussian nurses used similar strategies to cope with stress in the face of the COVID-19 pandemic. The social and demographic differences between Polish and Belorussian nurses differentiated the choice of coping strategies among the respondents to a greater extent than the completely different approach of the media and authorities to the COVID-19 pandemic in the two countries. The threat of the COVID-19 pandemic does not affect the choice of stress coping strategies by nurses in Poland and Belarus. Being in quarantine or home isolation favored the use of active coping strategies among Belorussian nurses. Polish nurses, on the other hand, were more likely to turn to religion after being quarantined.
DOI: 10.1097/anc.0000000000000514
发表时间: 2018-08-01
影响因子: 1.7
作者:
Fiske, Elizabeth
通讯作者: Fiske, Elizabeth
DOI: 10.1186/s12912-021-00630-2
发表时间: 2021-07-12
期刊: BMC nursing
影响因子: 3.2
作者:
Bodys-Cupak I;Majda A;Kurowska A;Ziarko E;Zalewska-Puchała J
通讯作者: Zalewska-Puchała J
DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17217857
发表时间: 2020-10-27
影响因子: --
作者:
Giorgi G;Lecca LI;Alessio F;Finstad GL;Bondanini G;Lulli LG;Arcangeli G;Mucci N
通讯作者: Mucci N
DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18189453
发表时间: 2021-09-08
影响因子: --
作者:
Finstad GL;Giorgi G;Lulli LG;Pandolfi C;Foti G;León-Perez JM;Cantero-Sánchez FJ;Mucci N
通讯作者: Mucci N
DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.56.2.267
发表时间: 1989-02-01
影响因子: 7.6
作者:
CARVER, CS;SCHEIER, MF;WEINTRAUB, JK
通讯作者: WEINTRAUB, JK