How animal agriculture stakeholders define, perceive, and are impacted by antimicrobial resistance: challenging the Wellcome Trust's Reframing Resistance principles.
How animal agriculture stakeholders define, perceive, and are impacted by antimicrobial resistance: challenging the Wellcome Trust's Reframing Resistance principles.
复制标题
DOI：
10.1007/s10460-021-10197-y
复制
发表时间：
2021-12
影响因子：
4.5
通讯作者：
Davis MF
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Innes GK;Markos A;Dalton KR;Gould CA;Nachman KE;Fanzo J;Barnhill A;Frattaroli S;Davis MF
人类、动物和环境面临着一个普遍的危机：抗菌素耐药性（AR）。在包括人类和兽医在内的许多部门解决AR及其多学科原因仍然不发达。AR努力的一个障碍是一个不一致的过程，以纳入利益相关者的充分了解AR是什么以及如何扼杀其发展和传播，特别是来自畜牧业部门的利益相关者，这是抗菌药物的最大购买者之一。2019年，威康信托基金会发布了《重新构建耐药性：如何有效地就抗菌素耐药性进行沟通》（重新构建耐药性），该报告提出需要建立一致和协调的信息传递工作，描述AR危机及其对所有利益相关者健康和福祉的全球影响。然而，重新构建阻力并没有特别涉及动物农业社区。本研究调查了两个原则之间的差距差距建议的阻力和动物农业利益相关者。为了进行这项分析，研究小组对美国畜牧业利益相关者进行了31次半结构化访谈。参与者报告了对各种问题的态度，信念和实践，包括他们如何定义AR以及AR危机对哪些实体影响最大。对重构阻力的原则2“简明地解释基本面”和原则3“强调这是一个普遍的问题;它可以影响任何人，包括你”的探索揭示了AR的基本面和AR危机影响“谁”的共识的分歧。原则2最好承认畜牧业利益相关者支持一系列复杂的观点，这些观点不能用单一的观点或原则来概括。作为对抗AR的主要工具，行为改变必须首先通过与利益相关者群体的联系并了解他们的观点来实现。
Humans, animals, and the environment face a universal crisis: antimicrobial resistance (AR). Addressing AR and its multi-disciplinary causes across many sectors including in human and veterinary medicine remains underdeveloped. One barrier to AR efforts is an inconsistent process to incorporate the plenitude of stakeholders about what AR is and how to stifle its development and spread—especially stakeholders from the animal agriculture sector, one of the largest purchasers of antimicrobial drugs. In 2019, The Wellcome Trust released Reframing Resistance: How to communicate about antimicrobial resistance effectively (Reframing Resistance), which proposed the need to establish a consistent and harmonized messaging effort that describes the AR crisis and its global implications for health and wellbeing across all stakeholders. Yet, Reframing Resistance does not specifically engage the animal agriculture community. This study investigates the gap between two principles recommended by Reframing Resistance and animal agriculture stakeholders. For this analysis, the research group conducted 31 semi-structured interviews with a diverse group of United States animal agriculture stakeholders. Participants reported attitudes, beliefs, and practices about a variety of issues, including how they defined AR and what entities the AR crisis impacts most. Exploration of Reframing Resistance’s Principle 2, “explain the fundamentals succinctly” and Principle 3, “emphasis that this is universal issue; it can affect anyone, including you” reveals disagreement in both the fundamentals of AR and consensus of “who” the AR crisis impacts. Principle 2 may do better to acknowledge that animal agriculture stakeholders espouse a complex array of perspectives that cannot be summed up in a single perspective or principle. As a primary tool to combat AR, behavior change must be accomplished first through outreach to stakeholder groups and understanding their perspectives.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子：
3.9
作者：
Economou V;Gousia P
通讯作者：
Gousia P
影响因子：
4
作者：
Fortane, Nicolas
通讯作者：
Fortane, Nicolas
影响因子：
3.5
作者：
Castillo Neyra R;Vegosen L;Davis MF;Price L;Silbergeld EK
通讯作者：
Silbergeld EK
影响因子：
3.2
作者：
Pinto Ferreira J
通讯作者：
Pinto Ferreira J
影响因子：
3.1
作者：
HUMMEL, R;TSCHAPE, H;WITTE, W
通讯作者：
WITTE, W