Are complex DCE-MRI models supported by clinical data?
Are complex DCE-MRI models supported by clinical data?
复制标题
DOI:
10.1002/mrm.26189
复制
发表时间:
2017-03
影响因子:
3.3
通讯作者:
Garbow JR
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Duan C;Kallehauge JF;Bretthorst GL;Tanderup K;Ackerman JJ;Garbow JR
To ascertain whether complex DCE-MRI tracer kinetic models are supported by data acquired in the clinic and to determine the consequences of limited contrast-to-noise. Generically representative in silico and clinical (cervical cancer) DCE-MRI data were examined. Bayesian model selection evaluated support for four compartmental DCE-MRI models: the Tofts model (TM), Extended Tofts model (ETM), Compartmental Tissue Uptake model (CTUM), and Two-Compartment Exchange model (2CXM). Complex DCE-MRI models were more sensitive to noise than simpler models with respect to both model selection and parameter estimation. Indeed, as contrast-to-noise decreased, complex DCE models became less probable and simpler models more probable. The less complex TM and CTUM were the optimal models for the DCE-MRI data acquired in the clinic. [In cervical tumors, Ktrans, Fp, and PS increased after radiotherapy (P = 0.004, 0.002, and 0.014, respectively)]. Caution is advised when considering application of complex DCE-MRI kinetic models to data acquired in the clinic. It follows that data-driven model selection is an important prerequisite to DCE-MRI analysis. Model selection is particularly important when high-order, multi-parametric models are under consideration. (Parameters obtained from kinetic modelling of cervical cancer clinical DCE-MRI data showed significant changes at an early stage of radiotherapy.)
登录
查看更多内容
DOI:
10.1002/jmri.24469
发表时间:
2014-11
期刊:
Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI
影响因子:
--
作者:
Chwang WB;Jain R;Bagher-Ebadian H;Nejad-Davarani SP;Iskander AS;VanSlooten A;Schultz L;Arbab AS;Ewing JR
通讯作者:
Ewing JR
影响因子:
2.5
作者:
Li, Xin;Huang, Wei;Rooney, William D.
通讯作者:
Rooney, William D.
影响因子:
3.3
作者:
Buckley, David L.;Kershaw, Lucy E.;Stanisz, Greg J.
通讯作者:
Stanisz, Greg J.
影响因子:
3.3
作者:
Donaldson, Stephanie B.;West, Catharine M. L.;Buckley, David L.
通讯作者:
Buckley, David L.
影响因子:
9.6
作者:
George, ML;Dzik-Jurasz, ASK;Swift, RI
通讯作者:
Swift, RI