Collocational Processing in L1 and L2: The Effects of Word Frequency, Collocational Frequency, and Association

Collocational Processing in L1 and L2: The Effects of Word Frequency, Collocational Frequency, and Association
复制标题

L1 和 L2 中的搭配处理:词频、搭配频率和关联的影响

DOI:
10.1111/lang.12427
复制
发表时间:
2020
期刊:
影响因子:
4.4
通讯作者:
Öksüz D
Öksüz D
中科院分区:
人文科学1区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Öksüz D

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

本研究探讨了词频、搭配频率和联想对母语和二语搭配加工的影响。一个可接受性判断任务,管理L1和L2的英语发言者。使用混合效应模型分析3种类型形容词-名词对的反应时间:(a)高频,(B)低频和(c)基线项目。本研究扩展了以往的研究,考察了单个词和搭配频率计数对母语和二语使用者处理搭配的影响是否存在差异。这项研究还比较了L1和L2说话者的反应时间受互信息和对数Dice分数影响的程度,这是语料库衍生的关联度量。两组参与者都表现出对单个单词和搭配频率计数的敏感性。然而,与低频搭配相比,单个词频计数对处理高频搭配的影响较小。两组参与者对所使用的关联措施同样敏感。
This study investigated the effects of individual word frequency, collocational frequency, and association on L1 and L2 collocational processing. An acceptability judgment task was administered to L1 and L2 speakers of English. Response times were analyzed using mixed‐effects modeling for 3 types of adjective–noun pairs: (a) high‐frequency, (b) low‐frequency, and (c) baseline items. This study extends previous research by examining whether the effects of individual word and collocation frequency counts differ for L1 and L2 speakers’ processing of collocations. This study also compared the extent to which L1 and L2 speakers’ response times are affected by mutual information and log Dice scores, which are corpus‐derived association measures. Both groups of participants demonstrated sensitivity to individual word and collocation frequency counts. However, there was a reduced effect of individual word frequency counts for processing high‐frequency collocations compared to low‐frequency collocations. Both groups of participants were similarly sensitive to the association measures used.
DOI: 10.1111/tops.12258
发表时间: 2017
影响因子: 3
作者:
Stewart M. McCauley;Morten H. Christiansen
通讯作者: Morten H. Christiansen
英语学习者短语的自动化方法
DOI: --
发表时间: 1998
期刊:
影响因子: --
作者:
S. D. Cock;S. Granger;G. Leech;Tony McEnery
通讯作者: Tony McEnery
DOI: 10.1075/ijcl.17.3.04har
发表时间: 2012-01-01
影响因子: 1
作者:
Hardie, Andrew
通讯作者: Hardie, Andrew
学习者语料库中的搭配
DOI: 10.1075/scl.14
发表时间: 2005
影响因子: 0.5
作者:
Nadja Nesselhauf
通讯作者: Nadja Nesselhauf
致命错误、可怕错误还是极端错误?:频率对离线/在线搭配处理的影响
DOI: --
发表时间: 2015
期刊:
影响因子: --
作者:
Suhad Sonbul
通讯作者: Suhad Sonbul