Impacts of climate change adaptation options on soil functions: A review of European case-studies.

Impacts of climate change adaptation options on soil functions: A review of European case-studies.
复制标题

DOI:
10.1002/ldr.3006
复制
发表时间:
2018-08
影响因子:
4.7
通讯作者:
Schönhart M
Schönhart M
中科院分区:
农林科学2区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Hamidov A;Helming K;Bellocchi G;Bojar W;Dalgaard T;Ghaley BB;Hoffmann C;Holman I;Holzkämper A;Krzeminska D;Kværnø SH;Lehtonen H;Niedrist G;Øygarden L;Reidsma P;Roggero PP;Rusu T;Santos C;Seddaiu G;Skarbøvik E;Ventrella D;Żarski J;Schönhart M

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

土壤对于支持粮食安全和其他生态系统服务至关重要。气候变化可以直接和间接地影响土壤功能。直接影响包括温度、降水和水分状况的变化。间接影响包括由灌溉、作物轮作变化和耕作做法等适应措施引起的影响。虽然关于直接影响的知识很丰富,但对农业适应备选办法的间接影响的了解还不够全面。对欧洲20个农业适应案例研究进行了审查,以评估对土壤威胁和土壤功能的影响以及与可持续发展目标(SDG)的联系。主要结论如下:(a)适应备选办法反映了当地条件;(B)预计土壤侵蚀威胁将减少,土壤有机碳将增加,但某些地区的压实可能会增加;大多数适应备选办法预计将改善土壤的粮食和生物量生产功能、土壤有机碳储存以及储存、过滤、转化和再循环能力,土壤功能与可持续发展目标之间的联系意味着可持续发展目标2(实现粮食安全和促进可持续农业)和可持续发展目标13(采取行动应对气候变化)的改善,而与可持续发展目标15(可持续利用陆地生态系统)的关系在很大程度上是未知的。得出的结论是,农业适应的选择,即使集中在提高产量,有可能超过气候变化对土壤退化的负面直接影响,在许多欧洲地区。
Soils are vital for supporting food security and other ecosystem services. Climate change can affect soil functions both directly and indirectly. Direct effects include temperature, precipitation, and moisture regime changes. Indirect effects include those that are induced by adaptations such as irrigation, crop rotation changes, and tillage practices. Although extensive knowledge is available on the direct effects, an understanding of the indirect effects of agricultural adaptation options is less complete. A review of 20 agricultural adaptation case‐studies across Europe was conducted to assess implications to soil threats and soil functions and the link to the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). The major findings are as follows: (a) adaptation options reflect local conditions; (b) reduced soil erosion threats and increased soil organic carbon are expected, although compaction may increase in some areas; (c) most adaptation options are anticipated to improve the soil functions of food and biomass production, soil organic carbon storage, and storing, filtering, transforming, and recycling capacities, whereas possible implications for soil biodiversity are largely unknown; and (d) the linkage between soil functions and the SDGs implies improvements to SDG 2 (achieving food security and promoting sustainable agriculture) and SDG 13 (taking action on climate change), whereas the relationship to SDG 15 (using terrestrial ecosystems sustainably) is largely unknown. The conclusion is drawn that agricultural adaptation options, even when focused on increasing yields, have the potential to outweigh the negative direct effects of climate change on soil degradation in many European regions.
DOI: 10.2489/jswc.66.4.276
发表时间: 2011-07-01
影响因子: 3.9
作者:
Lal, R.;Delgado, J. A.;Rotz, A.
通讯作者: Rotz, A.
DOI: 10.1016/j.agsy.2016.12.016
发表时间: 2017-03-01
影响因子: 6.6
作者:
Mandryk, Maryia;Reidsma, Pytrik;van Ittersum, Martin K.
通讯作者: van Ittersum, Martin K.
DOI: 10.1007/s10113-014-0679-8
发表时间: 2016-01-01
影响因子: 4.2
作者:
Holman, Ian P.;Harrison, Paula A.;Metzger, Marc J.
通讯作者: Metzger, Marc J.
DOI: 10.1186/s13750-015-0049-0
发表时间: 2015-01-01
影响因子: 3.3
作者:
Haddaway, Neal R.;Hedlund, Katarina;Soderstrom, Bo
通讯作者: Soderstrom, Bo
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2014.09.004
发表时间: 2015-01-01
影响因子: 6.9
作者:
Gutzler, C.;Helming, K.;Zander, P.
通讯作者: Zander, P.