Long-term behavioral sensitization to apomorphine is independent of conditioning and increases conditioned pecking, but not preference, in pigeons
Long-term behavioral sensitization to apomorphine is independent of conditioning and increases conditioned pecking, but not preference, in pigeons
复制标题
对阿朴吗啡的长期行为敏感性与条件反射无关,并且会增加鸽子的条件啄食,但不会增加偏好
DOI:
10.1016/j.bbr.2017.08.037
复制
发表时间:
2018
影响因子:
2.7
通讯作者:
Güntürkün
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Anselme;Tabrik;Güntürkün
When rodents are given a free choice between a variable option and a constant option, they may prefer variability. This preference is even sometimes increased following repeated administration of a dopamine agonist. The present study was the first to examine preference for variability under the systemic administration of a dopamine agonist, apomorphine (Apo), in birds. Experiment 1 tested the drug-free preference and the propensity to choose of pigeons for a constant over a variable delay. It appeared that they preferred and decided more quickly to peck at the optimal delay option. Experiment 2 assessed the effects of a repeated injection of Apo on delay preference, in comparison with previous control tests within the same individuals. Apo treatment might have decreased the number of pecks at the constant option across the different experimental phases, but failed to induce a preference for the variable option. In Experiment 3, two groups of pigeons (Apo-sensitized and saline) were used in order to avoid inhomogeneity in treatments. They had to choose between a 50% probability option and a 5-s delay option. Conditioned pecking and the propensity to choose were higher in the Apo-sensitized pigeons, but, in each group, the pigeons showed indifference between the two options. This experiment also showed that long-term behavioral sensitization to Apo can occur independently of a conditioning process. These results suggest that Apo sensitization can enhance the attractiveness of conditioned cues, while having no effect on the development of a preference for variable-delay and probabilistic schedules of reinforcement.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子:
3.6
作者:
E. Drewe
通讯作者:
E. Drewe
影响因子:
3.4
作者:
L. Vanderschuren;A. Schoffelmeer;A. H. Mulder;T. Vries
通讯作者:
T. Vries
影响因子:
2.7
作者:
Carey, RJ;Gui, JM
通讯作者:
Gui, JM
影响因子:
1.9
作者:
Anagnostaras, SG;Robinson, TE
通讯作者:
Robinson, TE
影响因子:
2.7
作者:
M. Acerbo;P. Gargiulo;Ines Krug;J. Delius
通讯作者:
J. Delius