Species misidentification in local markets: Discrepancies between reporting and molecular identification of bushmeat species in northern Uganda.
Species misidentification in local markets: Discrepancies between reporting and molecular identification of bushmeat species in northern Uganda.
复制标题
DOI:
10.1016/j.onehlt.2021.100251
复制
发表时间:
2021-12
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Souza M
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Dell B;Masembe C;Gerhold R;Willcox A;Okafor C;Souza M
Bushmeat hunting and consumption, although widely utilized as necessary supplement to household income and nutrition in many regions, presents threats to public health and wildlife conservation efforts. In northern Uganda, consumption of bats and primates, two wildlife groups often implicated in zoonotic disease emergence, is not widely culturally accepted; however, these species are reported by hunters to often be hunted and sold as culturally desirable species, like antelope and warthog. To investigate the prevalence of market bushmeat misidentifiction, we collected 229 bushmeat samples from 23 communities adjacent to Murchison Falls National Park. Reported species was recorded on acquisition for each sample. PCR targeting mammalian cyt b and 12 s rRNA genes and sequencing were performed to identify samples to the lowest taxonomic unit using NCBI BLAST. Overall, 27.9% (61/219) of samples had disparate results between species reported and BLAST analysis. Thirty-four species were identified, with the most frequent wildlife being waterbuck (31.5%), warthog (13.7%), and black rat (5.9%). These data reveal a public health risk for bushmeat consumers in northern Uganda as they cannot assess species-related risk when purchasing bushmeat and take appropriate precautions against zoonotic pathogen exposure. These data also provide insight into regional hunter prey preference and market preference of local community members which may inform conservation strategy in the region. The most frequently identified wildlife species were antelopes. Nearly a 30% discrepancy between species reported at point of sale and PCR confirmation. Samples from hunters had statistically lower discrepancy than cooks and dealers.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子:
6.3
作者:
Fa, John E.;Olivero, Jesus;Vargas, Juan M.
通讯作者:
Vargas, Juan M.
影响因子:
2.7
作者:
Fa, JE;Currie, D;Meeuwig, J
通讯作者:
Meeuwig, J
影响因子:
3.7
作者:
Dell BM;Souza MJ;Willcox AS
通讯作者:
Willcox AS
影响因子:
64.8
作者:
Jones KE;Patel NG;Levy MA;Storeygard A;Balk D;Gittleman JL;Daszak P
通讯作者:
Daszak P
DOI:
10.1038/nrmicro.2017.45
发表时间:
2017-08
期刊:
Nature reviews. Microbiology
影响因子:
--
作者:
Plowright RK;Parrish CR;McCallum H;Hudson PJ;Ko AI;Graham AL;Lloyd-Smith JO
通讯作者:
Lloyd-Smith JO