Finger Tapping Task Activation vs. TMS Hotspot: Different Locations and Networks
Finger Tapping Task Activation vs. TMS Hotspot: Different Locations and Networks
复制标题
手指敲击任务激活与 TMS 热点:不同的位置和网络
DOI:
10.1007/s10548-019-00741-9
复制
发表时间:
2019-11
期刊:
影响因子:
2.7
通讯作者:
Zhang Jian
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Wang Jue;Meng Hai-Jiang;Ji Gong-Jun;Jing Ying;Wang Hong-Xiao;Deng Xin-Ping;Feng Zi-Jian;Zhao Na;Zang Yu-Feng;Zhang Jian
Both functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) and transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) have been used to non-invasively localize the human motor functional area. These locations can be clinically used as stimulation target of TMS treatment. However, it has been reported that the finger tapping fMRI activation and TMS hotspot were not well-overlapped. The aim of the current study was to measure the distance between the finger tapping fMRI activation and the TMS hotspot, and more importantly, to compare the network difference by using resting-state fMRI. Thirty healthy participants underwent resting-state fMRI, task fMRI, and then TMS hotspot localization. We found significant difference of locations between finger tapping fMRI activation and TMS hotspot. Specifically, the finger tapping fMRI activation was more lateral than the TMS hotspot in the premotor area. The fMRI activation peak and TMS hotspot were taken as seeds for resting-state functional connectivity analyses. Compared with TMS hotspot, finger tapping fMRI activation peak showed more intensive functional connectivity with, e.g., the bilateral premotor, insula, putamen, and right globus pallidus. The findings more intensive networks of finger tapping activation than TMS hotspot suggest that TMS treatment targeting on the fMRI activation area might result in more remote effects and would be more helpful for TMS treatment on movement disorders.
登录
查看更多内容
DOI:
10.1073/pnas.0504136102
发表时间:
2005-07-05
影响因子:
11.1
作者:
Fox, MD;Snyder, AZ;Raichle, ME
通讯作者:
Raichle, ME
影响因子:
2.7
作者:
Kallioniemi, Elisa;Julkunen, Petro
通讯作者:
Julkunen, Petro
影响因子:
4.8
作者:
Zhang D;Johnston JM;Fox MD;Leuthardt EC;Grubb RL;Chicoine MR;Smyth MD;Snyder AZ;Raichle ME;Shimony JS
通讯作者:
Shimony JS
影响因子:
4.6
作者:
通讯作者:
--
DOI:
10.1073/pnas.0502762102
发表时间:
2005-08-30
影响因子:
11.1
作者:
Lehéricy, S;Benali, H;Doyon, J
通讯作者:
Doyon, J