课题基金 / 基金详情

Doctoral Dissertation Research: Preventive Law Through Plain Language: Testing a Pyscholegal Audience Based Evaluation of Contract Perception and Comprehension

Doctoral Dissertation Research: Preventive Law Through Plain Language: Testing a Pyscholegal Audience Based Evaluation of Contract Perception and Comprehension
博士论文研究:通过简单语言预防法:测试基于心理观众的合同感知和理解评估
批准号:
9618365
负责人:
Steven Penrod
金额:
$0.55万
依托单位国家:
美国
项目类别:
Standard Grant
财政年份:
1997
资助国家:
美国
项目状态:
已结题
起止时间:
1997-04-01 至 1998-09-30

项目摘要

项目成果

Steven Penrod的其他基金

相似基金

相关文献

中文摘要
翻译
点击翻译按钮获取中文摘要
英文摘要
Penrod 9618365 Standardized form contracts are used in the majority of modern contractual transactions and have become an indispensable part of contemporary commerce. Many times the meaning of these contracts is unclear to the public because they are written in arcane language that is difficult for lawyers and non-lawyers to decipher. This research uses a two-stage empirical process to study plain language provisions .Both qualitative and quantitative methods are used. The first stage explores contract schema of both lawyers and laypersons elicited via focus group methods. Using the schema elicited in the first stage, questions will be developed to measure the effects of provisions of plain language statutes on comprehension, perceptions of enforceability and fairness, and attributions toward the drafting parties. A true experiment will test these effects with a sample of 232 adults. This research will inform schema theory and extend the existing research on clarity of judicial instruction to the domain of contracts. %%% Standardized form contracts are used in the majority of modern contractual transactions and have become an indispensable part of contemporary commerce. Many times the meaning of these contracts is unclear to the public because they are written in arcane language that is difficult for lawyers and non-lawyers to decipher. This research uses a two-stage empirical process to study plain language provisions .Both qualitative and quantitative methods are used. The first stage explores contract schema of both lawyers and laypersons elicited via focus group methods. Using the schema elicited in the first stage, questions will be developed to measure the effects of provisions of plain language statutes on comprehension, perceptions of enforceability and fairness, and attributions toward the drafting parties. A true experiment will test these effects with a sample of 232 adults. This research will inform schema theory and extend the existing research on clarity of judi cial instruction to the domain of contracts. ***
期刊论文(0)
专著(0)
科研奖励(0)
会议论文
Factual guilt, perceived guilt, and race: How defense attorneys make plea recommendations in real-world circumstances
Assessing Eyewitness Identification
Doctoral Dissertation Research: Disclosure in Plea Bargaining
Issue-specific jury instructions in eyewitness cases: Are they more effective than traditional safeguards?
海外基金