课题基金 / 基金详情

The Death Equation: Decisionmaking in Death Penalty Cases

The Death Equation: Decisionmaking in Death Penalty Cases
死亡方程:死刑案件中的决策
批准号:
9810039
负责人:
Steven Penrod
金额:
$17.2万
依托单位国家:
美国
项目类别:
Standard Grant
财政年份:
1998
资助国家:
美国
项目状态:
已结题
起止时间:
1998-09-15 至 2001-02-28

项目摘要

项目成果

Steven Penrod的其他基金

相似基金

相关文献

中文摘要
翻译
点击翻译按钮获取中文摘要
英文摘要
Presently, 38 states, the U.S. government, and the U.S. military enforce the death penalty. During 1997, 74 people were executed in the United States, while over 3200 others awaited capital punishment on death row. An even larger number of cases were tried unsuccessfully. The research tests several hypotheses, underscored by the latest Supreme Court death penalty decision in Buchanan v. Angelone (1998), about the impact of instructions and arguments by counsel on jurors' understanding and use of mitigation evidence. In addition, the research will explore the impact of jury deliberations on the outcome decision. Death qualified community residents and student mock jurors are participating in a capital penalty hearing. Jurors are randomly assigned to treatment conditions. The results will help understand jurors' understanding of mitigating and aggravating circumstances. %%% Presently, 38 states, the U.S. government, and the U.S. military enforce the death penalty. During 1997, 74 people were executed in the United States, while over 3200 others awaited capital punishment on death row. An even larger number of cases were tried unsuccessfully. The research tests several hypotheses, underscored by the latest Supreme Court death penalty decision in Buchanan v. Angelone (1998), about the impact of instructions and arguments by counsel on jurors' understanding and use of mitigation evidence. In addition, the research will explore the impact of jury deliberations on the outcome decision. Death qualified community residents and student mock jurors are participating in a capital penalty hearing. Jurors are randomly assigned to treatment conditions. The results will help understand jurors' understanding of mitigating and aggravating circumstances.
期刊论文(0)
专著(0)
科研奖励(0)
会议论文
Factual guilt, perceived guilt, and race: How defense attorneys make plea recommendations in real-world circumstances
Assessing Eyewitness Identification
Doctoral Dissertation Research: Disclosure in Plea Bargaining
Issue-specific jury instructions in eyewitness cases: Are they more effective than traditional safeguards?
海外基金