课题基金 / 基金详情

Doctoral Dissertation Research: Disclosure in Plea Bargaining

Doctoral Dissertation Research: Disclosure in Plea Bargaining
博士论文研究:辩诉交易中的披露
批准号:
1823506
负责人:
Steven Penrod
金额:
$1.62万
依托单位国家:
美国
项目类别:
Standard Grant
财政年份:
2018
资助国家:
美国
项目状态:
已结题
起止时间:
2018-09-01 至 2022-09-30

项目摘要

项目成果

Steven Penrod的其他基金

相似基金

相关文献

中文摘要
翻译
点击翻译按钮获取中文摘要
英文摘要
Title: Doctoral Dissertation Research: Disclosure in Plea BargainingAbstract: The vast majority of criminal cases in the United States are disposed of through plea bargaining. Yet, the Supreme Court has held that prosecutors are not required to disclose impeachment evidence to defendants at the plea stage of the process. This project will employ an experimental approach to test the Supreme Court's assumption that disclosure of impeachment evidence is not necessary to defendants. More particularly, the experiments will help determine whether the effect of disclosure on defense attorney decision making during plea bargaining differs as a function of evidence type, whether impeachment vs. exculpatory evidence. The primary goal of this project is to assess the impact of pre-plea disclosure of different types of evidence. To do so, the project will recruit a nationwide sample of practicing defense attorneys and present them with fictional case files. By experimentally manipulating participants' access to different types and amounts of impeachment and exculpatory evidence in mock plea-bargaining scenarios, the project will systematically test whether impeachment and exculpatory evidence function differently with respect to their effect on defense attorneys' plea-related decisions. The project employs the shadow of the trial theoretical framework, which posits that defense attorneys' plea-related recommendations are primarily based on their perceived odds of winning at trial. As pre-plea disclosure of evidence may affect defense attorneys' assessments of the chances of acquittal, access to exculpatory and impeachment evidence could play a role in a defense attorney's ability to accurate gauge their odds at trial. As a result, this project has implications for the application of Sixth Amendment rights.This award reflects NSF's statutory mission and has been deemed worthy of support through evaluation using the Foundation's intellectual merit and broader impacts review criteria.
期刊论文(0)
专著(0)
科研奖励(0)
会议论文
Factual guilt, perceived guilt, and race: How defense attorneys make plea recommendations in real-world circumstances
Assessing Eyewitness Identification
Issue-specific jury instructions in eyewitness cases: Are they more effective than traditional safeguards?
Factors influencing plea bargaining decisions by prosecutors and defense attorneys
海外基金