课题基金 / 基金详情

The Aggression Debate: Human Nature, Science Popularization, and Politics in Late 20th Century America

The Aggression Debate: Human Nature, Science Popularization, and Politics in Late 20th Century America
侵略之争:20世纪末美国的人性、科学普及与政治
批准号:
0002057
负责人:
Nadine Weidman
金额:
$2.78万
依托单位:
依托单位国家:
美国
项目类别:
Standard Grant
财政年份:
2001
资助国家:
美国
项目状态:
已结题
起止时间:
2001-01-01 至 2002-06-30

项目摘要

项目成果

相似基金

相关文献

中文摘要
翻译
点击翻译按钮获取中文摘要
英文摘要
SES 00-02057 - Nadine Weidman (Independent Scholar) - "The Aggression Debate: Human Nature, Science Popularization, and Politics in Late Twentieth-Century America"The project is a historical study of the debate over the origins and nature of human aggression that took place in the 1960s and 1970s between the Austrian ethologist Konrad Lorenz (1903-1989) and the British-born American anthropologist M. F. Ashley Montagu (1905-1999). In a series of widely popular books, Lorenz and his followers argued that aggressiveness in humans was an instinct, an innate and unavoidable tendency, while Montagu maintained in writings also aimed at a lay audience that aggression resulted primarily from environmental stimuli. By examining popular writings, television, radio, and film productions, scientific papers, and the archival record, and by conducting interviews with several of the participants, the principal investigator plans to show how the Lorenz-Montagu aggression debate and the public responses to it affected conceptions of human nature, techniques and goals of scientific popularization, and political liberalism in late twentieth-century America. The analysis will consist of four parts: (1) of the Lorenz--Montagu debate; (2) of its relation to its scientific and intellectual contexts; (3) of the audience response to the debate; (4) of the relation of the debate to the biological determinisms of succeeding decades.
期刊论文(0)
专著(0)
科研奖励(0)
会议论文
海外基金