Discourses on War and Peace (1914/18-1939/1945)Munich between Cultural Pluralism and its Status as 'Capital of the NS-Movement'

战争与和平的话语（1914/18-1939/1945）文化多元主义及其“国民服役运动之都”地位之间的慕尼黑

• 批准号: 160996723
• 负责人: Professor Dr. Andreas Holzem
• 金额: --
• 依托单位: Lehrstuhl für Mittlere und Neuere Kirchengeschichte
• 依托单位国家: 德国
• 项目类别: Research Grants
• 财政年份: 2010
• 资助国家: 德国
• 起止时间: 2009-12-31 至 2014-12-31
• 项目状态: 已结题
• 来源: https://gepris.dfg.de/gepris/projekt/160996723?language=en
• 关键词: Discourses; War; Peace; 1914; 18

Discourses about war not only dominated private and public spheres during the two world wars (1914-18 and 1939-45). They also influenced to a great extent the peace discussions within the inter-war period.While war experiences could be shared against the background of the wars' indisputable reality, the inter-war period was not a convincingly communicated peace experience, because peace itself was not considered as "real". Within the public sphere, discourse battles continued in an effort to achieve a "real" peace by revising the conditions that were the result of ceasefire negotiations.These discussions, conceptualized as "Kriegsfriedensdiskurse (discourses on war and peace)", recovered the potential of legitimation and interpretation of a second World War that was only too sure to come. However, these theoretical constructions during the Weimar years were not necessarily legitimations of the Nazi war of conquest and of the Holocaust later on.Since September 2009, this research project has been successfully attending to the questions of these inter-war period battles of discourse as they occurred in Munich. Munich was a capital of pluralism on religious, cultural, societal, and political levels during the good, even golden years of the Weimar Republic. Nevertheless, the city was being forced into the status of "capital of Hitlers NS-movement (Hauptstadt der Bewegung)" at the same time. This project brings into focus the socio-political and ideological positioning of Bavarian Catholics and zooms in on their relationships to contrasting concepts of war and peace from other confessional, religious, and socio-political groups.This approach has proven to be extraordinarily fruitful and productive. The research project would have been completed according to its original schedule by autumn 2013 and therefore within the submitted grant period. However, recently and quite unpredictably, new and highly relevant source materials have been uncovered and have become accessible to researchers and the public. These are documents that until now were completely unknown and that must be integrated into the analysis to make sure that the outcome of the project is comprehensive.These documents are "visitors' logs (Besucher-Tagebücher)" that belonged to the archbishop of Munich Cardinal Michael Faulhaber and other important materials from his estate. This research project has identified Cardinal Faulhaber as the uncontested linchpin in all war-and-peace discourses in Munich. To comprehend the network of relevant participants and the topics of these debates, it is indispensable to evaluate these documents in addition to all the documents previously mentioned in the first project proposal for the funding period 2010-2013. Therefore, this application is a request to prolong this research project for ca. two years.

在两次世界大战期间（1914- 1918年和1939- 1945年），关于战争的讨论不仅主宰了私人和公共领域。它们还在很大程度上影响了两次世界大战之间的和平讨论，虽然可以在战争无可争辩的现实背景下分享战争经验，但两次世界大战之间的时期并不是一个令人信服的和平经验交流，因为和平本身并不被认为是“真实的”。在公共领域，为了通过修改停火谈判的结果来实现“真实的”和平，继续进行着话语之争，这些讨论被概念化为“战争与和平的话语"，恢复了对第二次世界大战的合法化和解释的潜力，而第二次世界大战肯定会到来。然而，这些理论建设在魏玛年不一定是合法化的纳粹征服战争和大屠杀后，自2009年9月以来，本研究项目已成功地参加了这些战争期间的话语斗争，因为他们发生在慕尼黑的问题。在魏玛共和国的黄金时期，慕尼黑是宗教、文化、社会和政治多元化的首都。然而，这座城市同时被迫成为“希特勒纳粹运动的首都（Hauptstadt der Bewegung）”。该项目聚焦巴伐利亚天主教徒的社会政治和意识形态定位，并放大他们与其他教派、宗教和社会政治团体的战争与和平概念之间的关系。这种方法已被证明是非常富有成效的。该研究项目本应按照原定时间表在2013年秋季完成，因此在提交的赠款期限内完成。然而，最近和相当不可预测的是，新的和高度相关的源材料已被发现，并已成为研究人员和公众访问。这些文件是迄今为止完全未知的，必须纳入分析，以确保项目的结果是全面的。这些文件是属于慕尼黑大主教的“访客日志（Besucher-Tagebücher）”以及他的遗产的其他重要材料。这个研究项目已经确定，在慕尼黑所有关于战争与和平的讨论中，红衣主教福尔哈伯是无可争议的关键人物。为了了解相关参与者网络和这些辩论的主题，除了先前在2010-2013年供资期第一个项目提案中提到的所有文件之外，还必须评估这些文件。因此，本申请是延长该研究项目的要求。两年