Doctoral Dissertation Research: Framing, Epistemic Communities and Scientific Consensus in Developing Countries
Doctoral Dissertation Research: Framing, Epistemic Communities and Scientific Consensus in Developing Countries
批准号:
0648473
负责人:
Peter Haas
金额:
$1.2万
依托单位国家:
美国
项目类别:
Standard Grant
财政年份:
2007
资助国家:
美国
项目状态:
已结题
起止时间:
2007-07-01 至 2009-06-30
中文摘要
题目:博士论文研究:发展中国家的框架、认知共同体与科学共识(ei: Peter Haas, Kemi george)摘要:认知共同体如何在欠发达国家发挥作用?认识论共同体的研究是在国际关系理论的建构主义学派中发展起来的,旨在解释非国家行为体如何影响政府的政策制定。认知社区是科学家的社会网络,他们分享对有效性的主张,行动的理由,并在因果论点上达成共识。共识是认知共同体影响政策制定的因果机制。在认知复杂的情况下,共识消除了竞争性主张的合法性,减少了不确定性,并澄清了适当的政策反应。在几个高度工业化国家,包括欧洲经济委员会的《远距离跨界空气污染公约》和《维也纳保护臭氧层公约》在内的国际环境条约的发起和成功执行都归功于知识共同体。然而,目前尚不清楚对高收入国家决策者具有说服力的环境论点是否会在最不发达国家的社会经济背景下产生共鸣。最不发达国家在世界资本生产中处于从属地位,环境决策相对容易受到发展压力的影响。对认知问题框架的研究认为,那些“适合”现有社会政治结构的论点更有可能被政策制定者选择,并随着时间的推移而持续下去。因此,在最不发达国家,环境知识主张必须以经济上合理的方式在战略上加以框定,以便具有说服力。将科学语言翻译给决策者的“知识经纪人”将在选择适当框架方面发挥重要作用。这个项目将扩大以前在牙买加开展的工作,对墨西哥和埃及为履行其作为《生物多样性公约》签署国的义务而执行的环境管理政策进行比较分析。它将确定所使用的框架类型,这些框架如何通过与政策制定者的互动而改变,以及它们是否有效地改变了国家行为。这些信息将通过对知识社区成员、知识经纪人和政策制定者的深入访谈以及对档案材料的分析来收集。框架的有效性将通过认识前后社区参与的人类活动的国家调节来衡量。通过研究框架,本项目通过澄清知识主张的社会背景的重要性,增加了对认知社区方法的分析深度。此外,通过指出哪些框架可能具有说服力,本项目将提出可能对发展中世界的环境倡导者有效的战略。该项目的结果将在地区和国家学术会议上提出,论文拟发表。
英文摘要
Title: Doctoral Dissertation Research: Framing, Epistemic Communities and Scientific Consensus in Developing CountriesPIs: Peter Haas and Kemi GeorgeProposal Number: 0648473Abstract: How do epistemic communities function in lesser developed countries (LDCs)? The study of epistemic communities was developed in the constructivist school of International Relations theory to explain how non-state actors can influence governmental policy creation. Epistemic communities are social networks of scientists that share claims to validity, rationales for action and hold a consensus on causal arguments. Consensus is the causal mechanism with which epistemic communities influence policy making. In cognitively complex circumstances, consensus de-legitimates competing claims, reduces uncertainty, and clarifies appropriate policy responses. Epistemic communities have been credited with the initiation and successful implementation of international environmental treaties in several highly industrialized countries (HICs), including the Economic Commission for Europe's convention on Long Range Trans-boundary Air Pollution and the Vienna Convention on the Protection of the Ozone Layer. However, it is not clear that environmental arguments that are persuasive to policy makers in HICs will resonate in the socioeconomic context of LDCs. LDCs occupy a subordinate position in the production of world capital and environmental policy-making is comparatively vulnerable to developmental pressures. The study of cognitive issue-framing posits that arguments that are framed to 'fit' with an existing sociopolitical structure are more likely to be selected by policy makers and endure over time. In LDCs then, environmental knowledge claims must be strategically framed in economically rational terms in order to be persuasive. 'Knowledge brokers' who translate scientific language to policy makers will play an important role in choosing appropriate frames. This project will expand on previous work conducted in Jamaica by undertaking a comparative analysis of environmental management policies implemented in Mexico and Egypt to comply with their obligations as signatories to the Convention on Biological Diversity. It will establish the types of frames used, how these frames are altered through interactions with policy makers, and whether they are effective in altering state behavior. This information will be gathered by in-depth interviews of epistemic community members, knowledge brokers and policy makers, and by analyses of archival material. Frame effectiveness will be measured by state regulation of human activity pre- and post-epistemic community involvement. By studying framing, this project adds analytical depth to the epistemic community approach by clarifying the importance of the social context of knowledge claims. Further, by indicating which frames are likely to be persuasive, this project will suggest strategies that are likely to be effective to environmental advocates in the developing world. The results of this project will be presented at regional and national academic conferences, and the dissertation is intended for publication.
期刊论文(0)
专著(0)
科研奖励(0)
会议论文
III: SMALL: Scalable In-Database Prescriptive Analytics for Dynamic Environments
-
批准号:2211918
-
项目类别:Standard Grant
-
资助金额:$60.0万
-
财政年份:2022
-
负责人:Peter Haas
-
依托单位:
EAGER: In-Database Prescriptive Analytics under Uncertainty
-
批准号:1943971
-
项目类别:Standard Grant
-
资助金额:$29.93万
-
财政年份:2019
-
负责人:Peter Haas
-
依托单位:
Doctoral Dissertation Research in Political Science: Regulation of Genetically Modified Seeds in Developing Countries
-
批准号:1224079
-
项目类别:Standard Grant
-
资助金额:$1.76万
-
财政年份:2012
-
负责人:Peter Haas
-
依托单位:
Collaborative Research: Social Learning in the Management of Global Environmental Risks
-
批准号:9123033
-
项目类别:Continuing Grant
-
资助金额:$11.65万
-
财政年份:1992
-
负责人:Peter Haas
-
依托单位:
Dynamics of International Environmental Cooperation
-
批准号:9010101
-
项目类别:Standard Grant
-
资助金额:$5.0万
-
财政年份:1990
-
负责人:Peter Haas
-
依托单位:
海外基金