Protective Action Decision Making in Wildfires

野火中的保护行动决策

• 批准号: 0653752
• 负责人: Thomas Cova
• 金额: $ 28.84万
• 依托单位: University of Utah
• 依托单位国家: 美国
• 项目类别: Continuing Grant
• 财政年份: 2007
• 资助国家: 美国
• 起止时间: 2007-07-01 至 2011-06-30
• 项目状态: 已结题
• 来源: https://www.nsf.gov/awardsearch/showAward?AWD_ID=0653752&HistoricalAwards=false
• 关键词: Protective; Action; Decision; Making; Wildfires

Emergency managers recommend protective actions in the face of many threats to minimize loss of life and property and to maximize use of limited resources. In the context of wildfire, two common recommendations are to evacuate or shelter those at risk. Given these two options, questions arise as to which protective-action is best in a given scenario and when it should be issued. This project will examine: 1) the factors that are important in determining which protective action is best in a given wildfire, 2) the strategies that decision makers use to combine the factors, and 3) the effect of uncertainty on the decision making process. The research is based on a three-step experimental approach that relies on interviews, static information boards, and an interactive wildfire simulator to elicit knowledge from both expert and novice decision makers in wildfire management. Causal models of the decision making process will be developed and tested that include the relevant factors and their importance, the method by which they are combined, and the effect of uncertainty.The results of this research will advance protective-action decision theory and provide a basis for improving the quality of decision-making in emergencies.

应急管理人员建议在面对许多威胁时采取保护行动，以尽量减少生命和财产损失，并最大限度地利用有限的资源。在野火的情况下，两个常见的建议是疏散或庇护处于危险中的人。考虑到这两种选择，就产生了在特定情况下哪种保护行动最好以及何时采取的问题。本项目将研究：1)确定在给定的野火中哪种保护行动最好的重要因素，2)决策者用来组合这些因素的策略，以及3)不确定性对决策过程的影响。该研究基于三步实验方法，依靠访谈、静态信息板和交互式野火模拟器，从专家和新手决策者那里获取野火管理方面的知识。将开发和测试决策过程的因果模型，其中包括相关因素及其重要性，它们组合的方法以及不确定性的影响。研究结果将进一步推动保护行动决策理论的发展，为提高突发事件决策质量提供依据。