Doctoral Dissertation Research: Democratic Participation in Non-Democracies? Mobilizing International Legal Regimes for National Reform in Three Monarchies

博士论文研究：非民主国家的民主参与？

• 批准号: 1228445
• 负责人: Kim Lane Scheppele
• 金额: $ 2.49万
• 依托单位: Princeton University
• 依托单位国家: 美国
• 项目类别: Standard Grant
• 财政年份: 2012
• 资助国家: 美国
• 起止时间: 2012-09-01 至 2015-08-31
• 项目状态: 已结题
• 来源: https://www.nsf.gov/awardsearch/showAward?AWD_ID=1228445&HistoricalAwards=false
• 关键词: Doctoral; Dissertation; Research; Democratic; Participation

Are there mechanisms through which non-democracies can be made more accountable to their citizens? One such mechanism may be the human rights monitoring process built into international treaties. States that ratify human rights agreements are obligated to submit reports to monitoring bodies about the steps taken to bring their domestic practices into line with the treaties. When a state submits a report, the monitoring bodies invite non-governmental organizations within the state to comment on whether the state's report is accurate. State reports and NGO feedback are periodically reviewed in a formal session, after which the monitoring body issues its own assessment of state compliance. In these ways, domestic NGOs have an opportunity to put indirect pressures on their states by providing information to the monitoring bodies on the states' compliance with human rights law. This process of citizen feedback is particularly salient in states with underdeveloped democratic institutions. This project analyzes the role of human rights treaties and their monitoring bodies in providing opportunities for domestic NGOs to pressure the state through a comparative analysis of Morocco, Jordan and Bahrain; three monarchies that offer limited opportunity for citizen participation in the legislative process but that have ratified human rights treaties that involve these monitoring processes. Reports on state compliance with treaties on rights of women and labor, and interviews with civil society activists and attention to NGOs' use of human rights monitoring to channel domestic pressure for national reform all allow evaluation of citizen feedback concerning human rights treaties. This research will discover the extent to which human rights monitoring mechanisms serve to empower citizens of states with underdeveloped democratic institutions, an issue of widespread interest. Comparative case studies allow us to explore how the international community can more effectively support citizen empowerment in aspiring democracies.

是否有机制可以使非民主国家对其公民更加负责？其中一个机制可能是国际条约中的人权监测程序。批准人权协定的国家有义务向监督机构提交报告，说明为使其国内做法符合条约而采取的步骤。当一个国家提交报告时，监督机构邀请该国境内的非政府组织对该国的报告是否准确发表评论。国家报告和非政府组织的反馈定期在正式会议上审查，之后监督机构发布自己对国家遵守情况的评估。这样，国内非政府组织就有机会通过向监督机构提供有关国家遵守人权法情况的资料，对国家施加间接压力。这种公民反馈的过程在民主制度不发达的国家尤为突出。该项目通过对摩洛哥、约旦和巴林进行比较分析，分析人权条约及其监测机构在为国内非政府组织向国家施加压力提供机会方面的作用;这三个君主国为公民参与立法进程提供了有限的机会，但批准了涉及这些监测进程的人权条约。关于国家遵守妇女权利和劳工权利条约的报告、与民间社会活动家的访谈以及对非政府组织利用人权监测来引导国内压力以促进国家改革的关注，都有助于评估公民对人权条约的反馈。这项研究将发现人权监测机制在多大程度上有助于增强民主体制不发达国家公民的权能，这是一个普遍感兴趣的问题。 比较案例研究使我们能够探讨国际社会如何能够更有效地支持有抱负的民主国家的公民赋权。