Doctoral Dissertation Research in Political Science: A Field Experiment on the Externalities of Protest

政治学博士论文研究：抗议外部性的现场实验

• 批准号: 1423867
• 负责人: Barry Ames
• 金额: $ 1.76万
• 依托单位: University of Pittsburgh
• 依托单位国家: 美国
• 项目类别: Standard Grant
• 财政年份: 2014
• 资助国家: 美国
• 起止时间: 2014-08-01 至 2015-07-31
• 项目状态: 已结题
• 来源: https://www.nsf.gov/awardsearch/showAward?AWD_ID=1423867&HistoricalAwards=false
• 关键词: Doctoral; Dissertation; Research; Political; Science

How can protests mobilize civil society? Activists and scholars alike assume that protests can inspire and mobilize non-participants, but psychological research would argue that protests are counterproductive to political participation. This project argues that the consequences of protest activity vary along a continuum of perceived conflict; the more conflict individuals perceive in the protest, the more likely they are to become less interested in politics and less willing to participate. The theory is tested through a novel field experiment, in which real protests in Mexico City serve as the treatment. For the experiment, levels of political participation and political attitudes among a random sample of local respondents are evaluated before and after exposure to protest activity. The research will evaluate how exposure to protest activity ultimately achieves a polarizing effect, such that individuals either mobilize or demobilize significantly depending on their perception of political conflict. Intellectual Merit: This project makes important theoretical and methodological contributions to the field's understanding of protests and mobilization. Theoretically, this project explores a new and potentially fruitful range of consequences for protest activity. It is possible that protesters who lose legislative battles win their own battles in the streets, and it is also possible that protesters who win their battles with legislators simultaneously lose among the electorate. Indeed, if protests change politics in more meaningful ways than simply winning and losing legislation, then those possible outcomes are worth considering. Moreover, to test this theory, the project uses a fundamentally new and innovative methodological approach that captures individual responses to protest activity at the ground level, measuring change as it occurs in real time. Protests, particularly their consequences, are notoriously difficult to study empirically. The data recorded in this experiment, and the design of the experiment itself, will be useful for any student of protests or mobilization who has been previously forced to rely on purely quantitative approaches, such as protest event analysis, or purely qualitative case studies. Broader Impacts: There are three major impacts of this project, the first of which relates directly to U.S. national security. Policymakers have long wondered about the social and political consequences of protest activity, but the diverse outcomes of the Arab Spring have pressed this topic with more urgency. Indeed, civil society's response to these movements has been unwieldy and, at times, unpredictably divisive and violent. For example, the first cases of the Arab Spring in Tunisia and Egypt were greeted with open arms as if mobilization would inevitably result in sweeping democratic practices. It later became clear civil society would not always respond this way, and many protests fizzled away without traction while others fostered hotbeds of violent polarization. This project will provide a framework from which to predict and explain which protest contexts are most likely to result in democratization, demobilization, or extreme polarization so that it will not be necessary to construct ad hoc foreign policy responses to subsequent waves of protest. Second, this project is notably beneficial to grassroots organizers and social movement organizations seeking to improve their purchase among civil society. Moreover, the project provides specific suggestions in terms of protest techniques and strategies that may yield positive and or negative externalities. Finally, this project will serve to build partnerships between the University of Pittsburgh and the "Caught in the Act" project, a network of European and Latin American scholars working to systematize protest research. The partnership will connect scholars from a variety of countries, and it will allow for the training of undergraduate students in survey work and experimental methods.

抗议如何动员公民社会？活动家和学者都认为抗议活动可以激励和动员非参与者，但心理学研究认为抗议活动对政治参与起反作用。这个项目认为，抗议活动的后果不同沿着一个连续的感知冲突;更多的冲突的个人认为，在抗议中，他们更有可能变得不感兴趣的政治和不愿意参与。该理论通过一个新颖的实地实验进行了测试，在这个实验中，墨西哥城的真实的抗议活动作为治疗手段。在实验中，政治参与和政治态度的水平之间的随机抽样当地受访者进行评估之前和之后暴露于抗议活动。该研究将评估如何暴露于抗议活动最终实现两极分化的效果，这样的人要么动员或复员显着取决于他们的政治冲突的看法。智力优势：该项目为该领域对抗议和动员的理解做出了重要的理论和方法贡献。从理论上讲，这个项目探索了一个新的和潜在的富有成效的抗议活动的后果范围。在立法斗争中失败的抗议者有可能在街头赢得自己的斗争，也有可能在与立法者的斗争中获胜的抗议者同时在选民中失败。事实上，如果抗议活动以更有意义的方式改变政治，而不仅仅是赢得和失去立法，那么这些可能的结果值得考虑。此外，为了检验这一理论，该项目采用了一种全新的创新方法，在基层捕捉个人对抗议活动的反应，测量真实的变化。抗议活动，特别是其后果，是出了名的难以实证研究。这个实验中记录的数据，以及实验本身的设计，对于任何以前被迫依赖于纯粹定量方法（如抗议事件分析）或纯粹定性案例研究的抗议或动员的学生都是有用的。更广泛的影响：该项目有三大影响，第一个直接关系到美国国家安全。长期以来，决策者一直想知道抗议活动的社会和政治后果，但阿拉伯之春的各种结果使这一主题更加紧迫。事实上，民间社会对这些运动的反应是笨拙的，有时是不可预测的分裂和暴力。例如，在突尼斯和埃及发生的阿拉伯之春的第一个案例受到了热烈欢迎，似乎动员将不可避免地导致全面的民主实践。后来很明显，民间社会并不总是这样回应，许多抗议活动在没有牵引力的情况下失败了，而其他人则助长了暴力两极分化的温床。该项目将提供一个框架，预测和解释哪些抗议背景最有可能导致民主化，复员或极端极化，因此没有必要构建针对后续抗议浪潮的临时外交政策反应。第二，该项目对基层组织者和社会运动组织寻求改善其在民间社会中的购买力非常有益。此外，该项目提供了具体的建议，在抗议技术和战略，可能会产生积极和/或消极的外部性。最后，该项目将有助于在匹兹堡大学与“当场被捕”项目之间建立伙伴关系，该项目是一个由欧洲和拉丁美洲学者组成的网络，致力于使抗议研究系统化。这一伙伴关系将把来自不同国家的学者联系起来，并将允许对本科生进行调查工作和实验方法的培训。