Collaborative Research: Detecting Seismic Anisotropy in the Upper Mantle and Upper Mantle Transition Zone

从地核逸出的热量通过对流被带到地表，这一过程导致地幔中的固体岩石在地质时间尺度上流动和变形。热的材料上升到表面，而冷的材料沉到底部。地幔通过对流的翻转被认为是划分地壳的刚性板块运动背后的驱动机制，这反过来又产生了地震和火山。关于将地表的刚性板块与下面的更易变形的对流地幔分开的边界的性质，仍然存在一些基本问题。特别是，410和670公里深度之间的地幔过渡带的性质在确定地球对流的性质方面起着重要作用。地幔中岩石的流动或变形将使矿物与流动方向对齐，这可以通过观察地震各向异性来用地震波检测。在这个项目中，PI将模拟地幔上部800公里处地震各向异性的三维变化。通过结合多种类型的地震数据，研究人员将大大提高他们的模型的准确性，特别是在地幔过渡带。他们的数值正演模拟技术使团队能够定量评估模型的不确定性。这一关键要素对于从矿物物理学、地球动力学或地幔地球化学的角度解释他们的模型以及指导未来的研究是必要的。通过改进地幔变形和板块构造的模型、公众宣传和培养地球深部研究科学的研究生，这些成果将使整个地球科学界受益。拟议的工作将解决三个主要问题：（1）岩石圈-软流圈边界（LAB）的地震学特征是什么？(2)上地幔深部和地幔过渡带是否存在可探测的地震各向异性？(3)MTZ的性质是什么？它在对流中的作用是什么？为了回答这些问题，研究人员将模拟全球，三维（3-D）变化的径向和方位角地震各向异性在上800公里的地幔使用联合正演模拟方法的基本和更高模式的面波色散测量，表面波到达角测量，SS前兆旅行时间，和SKS分裂数据。拟议的研究将产生（1）一个新的面波到达角数据集，这将大大提高上地幔小尺度各向异性的成像。这将使我们能够对海洋和大陆实验室的性质获得新的、更好的见解;（2）地幔上部800公里方位角和径向各向异性的新三维模型。它将使我们能够测试在上地幔深部径向各向异性的存在和迹象，这可以对这些深度的主导剪切方向和地幔流施加约束。它还将测试在250公里以下解决径向和方位各向异性的横向变化的能力，以及这些结构与地幔动力学的关系;（3）整合一个新的全球SS前兆走时数据集，提供MTZ边界的地形。这将减少MTZ边界地形和MTZ中的3-D结构变化之间的权衡，以及提供新的限制对地球的这种深度壳的热与成分性质。这项研究的一个重要方面是使用数值正演模拟，以统计确定良好的约束功能的新模型。通过正向建模，团队将能够通过量化参数权衡和不确定性来评估模型分辨率，这是确定哪些模型参数是鲁棒的关键。它还将指导未来的研究，以确定需要哪些其他类型的数据来进一步提高分辨率。

The heat that escapes from Earth's core is brought towards the surface through convection, a process that causes solid rocks in the mantle to flow and deform over geological time scales. Hot materials rise to the surface, while cold materials sink to the bottom. The overturn of the mantle through convection is thought to be the driving mechanism behind the motion of the rigid plates that divide the Earth's crust, which in turn generates earthquakes and volcanoes. Fundamental questions remain regarding the nature of the boundary that separates the rigid plates at the surface from the underlying, more deformable convecting mantle. In particular, the nature of the mantle transition zone between 410 and 670 km depth plays an important role in determining the nature of convection in the Earth. Flow or deformation of the rocks in the mantle will align minerals with the flow direction, which can be detected with seismic waves through the observation of seismic anisotropy. Here, the velocity with which waves travel becomes a function of the orientation of the travel path. In this project, the PIs will model three-dimensional variations in seismic anisotropy in the upper 800 km of the mantle. By combining multiple types of seismic data, the investigators will greatly enhance the accuracy of their model, particularly in the mantle transition zone. Their numerical forward modeling technique allows the team to quantitatively assess model uncertainties. This key element is necessary to interpret their models in terms of mineral physics, geodynamics, or mantle geochemistry, and to guide future research. The results will benefit the geoscience community as a whole through improved models of mantle deformation and plate tectonics, public outreach presentation, and training of graduate students in deep earth research science.The proposed work will address three major questions: (1) What is the seismological character of the lithosphere-asthenosphere boundary (LAB)? (2) Is there detectable seismic anisotropy in the deep upper mantle and mantle transition zone (MTZ)? (3) What is the nature of the MTZ and it's role in convection? To answer these questions, the investigators will model global, three-dimensional (3-D) variations in radial and azimuthal seismic anisotropy in the upper 800km of the mantle using a joint forward modeling approach for fundamental and higher mode surface wave dispersion measurements, surface wave arrival angle measurements, SS precursor travel times, and SKS splitting data. The proposed research will produce (1) a new surface wave arrival angle dataset that will greatly enhance the imaging of small-scale anisotropy in the uppermost mantle. This will allow us to obtain new, improved insight on the nature of the oceanic and continental LAB; (2) a new 3-D model of azimuthal and radial anisotropy in the upper 800km of the mantle. It will enable us to test for the presence and sign of radial anisotropy in the deep upper mantle, which can impose constraints on the dominant shear direction and mantle flow at these depths. It will also test the ability to resolve lateral variations in radial and azimuthal anisotropy below 250km and how such structures are related to mantle dynamics; (3) the integration of a new global dataset of SS precursor travel times providing topography at the MTZ boundaries. This will reduce trade-offs between MTZ boundaries topography and 3-D structural variations in the MTZ, as well as provide new constraints on the thermal versus compositional nature of this depth shell of the Earth. An important facet of this research is the use of numerical forward modeling to statistically identify well-constrained features of the new models. With forward modeling the team will be able to assess model resolution by quantifying parameter trade-offs and uncertainties, which is key to determining which model parameters are robust. It will also guide future research in determining what other type of data is needed to further improve resolution.