Individual - Group Comparison of Requests for and Use of Advice
个人与团体对建议的请求和使用的比较
基本信息
- 批准号:1451588
- 负责人:
- 金额:$ 17.99万
- 依托单位:
- 依托单位国家:美国
- 项目类别:Standard Grant
- 财政年份:2015
- 资助国家:美国
- 起止时间:2015-05-01 至 2019-05-31
- 项目状态:已结题
- 来源:
- 关键词:
项目摘要
This research examines the conditions that prompt groups to underutilize advice, and asks whether groups might sometimes underutilize advice to a lesser extent than individuals do. Because both individual and group decision makers often have advice available to them, gaining a better understanding of when they will be most likely to take advantage of that advice may help us understand why certain individuals or groups seem to make good decisions and why and when they might be prone to make bad ones. This research will contribute to national health and to US competitiveness to the extent it informs the design of processes that promote effective use of advice in individual and group decision making so as to improve individual outcomes and organizational performance.Decades of research have shown that decisions made in a social context, where many people's opinions are integrated before a final judgment is reached, tend to be better than decisions made by lone individuals (Kerr & Tindale, 2004; Larrick & Soll, 2006; Larson, 2010). Unfortunately, most people do not realize the benefits of integrating advice from others into their own judgments (Bonaccio & Dalal, 2006), and so they either underutilize advice or ignore it altogether. Further, it is not just individual decision makers that underutilize advice; decision-making groups do so as well. Indeed, one recent study found that small decision-making groups underutilized external advice to an even greater extent than individuals do, and, like individuals, they paid a price in accuracy for doing so (Minson and Mueller, 2012). The present research focuses on the conditions that prompt groups to underutilize advice, and asks whether groups might sometimes underutilize advice to a lesser extent than individuals do. Group members are typically very confident in their decisions right after they have reached a consensus, but beforehand, and especially when there is substantial diversity in their members' individual decision preferences, they are apt to have relatively low confidence in their judgments (Tindale, 1989). Because confidence likely plays an important role in determining openness to advice, we predict that groups will make much better use of advice prior to consensus when their members initially hold diverse decision preferences. In our first study, advice will be provided to both individuals and groups at various stages of the decision making process in order to learn more about when, during that process, groups and individuals are most likely to make good use of advice. Our second study will then explore these same processes in a more ecologically valid situation, where decision-makers must actively seek-out advice, rather than the advice being provided to them automatically.
本研究探讨了促使群体不充分利用建议的条件,并询问群体是否有时可能比个人不充分利用建议的程度更低。由于个人和群体决策者通常都有可用的建议,因此更好地了解他们何时最有可能利用这些建议,可以帮助我们理解为什么某些个人或群体似乎会做出好的决定,以及为什么以及何时他们可能会做出坏的决定。这项研究将有助于国民健康和美国的竞争力,因为它为促进个人和群体决策中有效使用建议的过程设计提供了信息,从而改善了个人结果和组织绩效。数十年的研究表明,在社会背景下做出的决策,在最终判断之前,许多人的意见都是综合的,往往比单独的个人做出的决定更好(Kerr& Tindale,2004; Larrick& Soll,2006; Larson,2010)。不幸的是,大多数人没有意识到将他人的建议整合到自己的判断中的好处(Bonaccio Dalal,2006),所以他们要么没有充分利用建议,要么完全忽略它。此外,不只是个别决策者没有充分利用咨询意见,决策团体也是如此。事实上,最近的一项研究发现,小型决策群体对外部建议的利用不足程度甚至超过了个人,而且,像个人一样,他们为此付出了准确性的代价(Minson和Mueller,2012)。本研究的重点是条件,促使团体未充分利用的意见,并询问是否有时团体可能未充分利用的意见,在较小的程度上比个人做的。群体成员通常在达成共识后对他们的决策非常有信心,但在达成共识之前,特别是当成员的个人决策偏好存在很大差异时,他们对自己的判断往往信心相对较低(Tindale,1989)。由于信心可能在决定对建议的开放性方面起着重要作用,我们预测,当成员最初持有不同的决策偏好时,群体将在达成共识之前更好地利用建议。在我们的第一项研究中,将在决策过程的各个阶段向个人和团体提供建议,以便更多地了解在决策过程中,团体和个人最有可能充分利用建议的时间。我们的第二项研究将在一个更生态有效的情况下探索这些相同的过程,决策者必须积极寻求建议,而不是自动提供给他们的建议。
项目成果
期刊论文数量(0)
专著数量(0)
科研奖励数量(0)
会议论文数量(0)
专利数量(0)
数据更新时间:{{ journalArticles.updateTime }}
{{
item.title }}
{{ item.translation_title }}
- DOI:
{{ item.doi }} - 发表时间:
{{ item.publish_year }} - 期刊:
- 影响因子:{{ item.factor }}
- 作者:
{{ item.authors }} - 通讯作者:
{{ item.author }}
数据更新时间:{{ journalArticles.updateTime }}
{{ item.title }}
- 作者:
{{ item.author }}
数据更新时间:{{ monograph.updateTime }}
{{ item.title }}
- 作者:
{{ item.author }}
数据更新时间:{{ sciAawards.updateTime }}
{{ item.title }}
- 作者:
{{ item.author }}
数据更新时间:{{ conferencePapers.updateTime }}
{{ item.title }}
- 作者:
{{ item.author }}
数据更新时间:{{ patent.updateTime }}
R. Scott Tindale其他文献
Framing and Group Decision-Making: Do Cognitive Changes Parallel Preference Changes?
框架和群体决策:认知变化是否与偏好变化平行?
- DOI:
10.1006/obhd.1993.1040 - 发表时间:
1993 - 期刊:
- 影响因子:4.6
- 作者:
R. Scott Tindale;Susan Sheffey;Leslie A. Scott - 通讯作者:
Leslie A. Scott
Individual and group reward allocation decisions in two situational contexts: Effects of relative need and performance.
两种情境下的个人和团体奖励分配决策:相对需求和绩效的影响。
- DOI:
- 发表时间:
1985 - 期刊:
- 影响因子:0
- 作者:
R. Scott Tindale;James H. Davis - 通讯作者:
James H. Davis
High aspiration hourly workers as potential entry-level professional employees
高抱负的小时工作为潜在的入门级专业员工
- DOI:
10.1177/089484539602300205 - 发表时间:
1996 - 期刊:
- 影响因子:2.9
- 作者:
E. Posavac;Dennis Dew;R. Scott Tindale;B. Dugoni;Susan Sheffey;Matthew S. Koch - 通讯作者:
Matthew S. Koch
Minority and majority influence in freely interacting groups: Qualitative versus quantitative differences
自由互动群体中的少数和多数影响:定性与定量差异
- DOI:
- 发表时间:
1996 - 期刊:
- 影响因子:0
- 作者:
Christine M. Smith;R. Scott Tindale;B. Dugoni - 通讯作者:
B. Dugoni
I Heard That … : Do Rumors Affect Hiring Decisions?
我听说……:谣言会影响招聘决定吗?
- DOI:
10.1111/ijsa.12110 - 发表时间:
2015 - 期刊:
- 影响因子:0
- 作者:
Dev K. Dalal;Dalia L Diab;R. Scott Tindale - 通讯作者:
R. Scott Tindale
R. Scott Tindale的其他文献
{{
item.title }}
{{ item.translation_title }}
- DOI:
{{ item.doi }} - 发表时间:
{{ item.publish_year }} - 期刊:
- 影响因子:{{ item.factor }}
- 作者:
{{ item.authors }} - 通讯作者:
{{ item.author }}
{{ truncateString('R. Scott Tindale', 18)}}的其他基金
The Role of Shared Mental Models and Cognitive Load on Group Memory
共享心理模型和认知负荷对群体记忆的作用
- 批准号:
0820344 - 财政年份:2008
- 资助金额:
$ 17.99万 - 项目类别:
Standard Grant
Social and Cognitive Processes in Group Decision Making
群体决策中的社会和认知过程
- 批准号:
0621632 - 财政年份:2006
- 资助金额:
$ 17.99万 - 项目类别:
Standard Grant
Social Sharedness, Shared Task Representations and Group Decision Making
社会共享、共享任务表示和群体决策
- 批准号:
0136332 - 财政年份:2002
- 资助金额:
$ 17.99万 - 项目类别:
Standard Grant
Shared Respresentations and Group Decision-Making
共享陈述和群体决策
- 批准号:
9730822 - 财政年份:1998
- 资助金额:
$ 17.99万 - 项目类别:
Standard Grant
相似国自然基金
分泌蛋白IGFBP2在儿童Group3/Group4型髓母细胞瘤恶性进展中的作用与机制研究
- 批准号:
- 批准年份:2022
- 资助金额:30 万元
- 项目类别:青年科学基金项目
大兴安岭火山湖Group I长链烯酮冷季节温标研究与过去2000年温度定量重建
- 批准号:42073070
- 批准年份:2020
- 资助金额:61 万元
- 项目类别:面上项目
近海沉积物中Marine Group I古菌新类群的发现、培养及其驱动碳氮循环的机制
- 批准号:92051115
- 批准年份:2020
- 资助金额:81.0 万元
- 项目类别:重大研究计划
MicroRNA靶向的漆酶基因及其所在Group 1 亚家族成员 调控水稻产量性状的功能机制
- 批准号:
- 批准年份:2019
- 资助金额:257 万元
- 项目类别:
超级增强子驱动的核心转录调控环路在Group_3亚型髓母细胞瘤的发病和治疗中的作用和机制
- 批准号:81972646
- 批准年份:2019
- 资助金额:55.0 万元
- 项目类别:面上项目
东北地区火山湖GroupⅠ类型的长链烯酮研究及其不饱和度温标的应用
- 批准号:41702187
- 批准年份:2017
- 资助金额:26.0 万元
- 项目类别:青年科学基金项目
中国源毕氏肠微孢子虫group 2基因型人兽共患特征的研究
- 批准号:31502055
- 批准年份:2015
- 资助金额:21.0 万元
- 项目类别:青年科学基金项目
人源Group IIE分泌型磷脂酶A2蛋白的结构生物学研究
- 批准号:31300670
- 批准年份:2013
- 资助金额:22.0 万元
- 项目类别:青年科学基金项目
连锁群选育法(Linkage Group Selection)在柔嫩艾美耳球虫表型相关基因研究中应用
- 批准号:30700601
- 批准年份:2007
- 资助金额:17.0 万元
- 项目类别:青年科学基金项目
原核生物基因内含子-group II intron 的研究
- 批准号:30770463
- 批准年份:2007
- 资助金额:30.0 万元
- 项目类别:面上项目
相似海外基金
Theory and Development in Self-help Housing Policy: International comparison of group self built housing
自助住房政策理论与发展:群体自建住房的国际比较
- 批准号:
21K04425 - 财政年份:2021
- 资助金额:
$ 17.99万 - 项目类别:
Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C)
Gait posture after extensive corrective fixation surgery in elderly patients with spinal deformities: A comparison of gait analysis by age group
老年脊柱畸形患者广泛矫正固定手术后的步态姿势:按年龄组进行步态分析的比较
- 批准号:
19K18460 - 财政年份:2019
- 资助金额:
$ 17.99万 - 项目类别:
Grant-in-Aid for Early-Career Scientists
A Comparison of Group Transdiagnostic Behavior Therapy (G-TBT) to Disorder-Specific Group Psychotherapies in the Recovery of Veterans with PTSD, Major Depression, and Related Conditions
团体跨诊断行为疗法 (G-TBT) 与特定障碍团体心理疗法在患有 PTSD、重度抑郁症和相关病症的退伍军人康复中的比较
- 批准号:
10237899 - 财政年份:2019
- 资助金额:
$ 17.99万 - 项目类别:
A Comparison of Group Transdiagnostic Behavior Therapy (G-TBT) to Disorder-Specific Group Psychotherapies in the Recovery of Veterans with PTSD, Major Depression, and Related Conditions
团体跨诊断行为疗法 (G-TBT) 与特定障碍团体心理疗法在患有 PTSD、重度抑郁症和相关病症的退伍军人康复中的比较
- 批准号:
10000778 - 财政年份:2019
- 资助金额:
$ 17.99万 - 项目类别:
A Comparison of Group Transdiagnostic Behavior Therapy (G-TBT) to Disorder-Specific Group Psychotherapies in the Recovery of Veterans with PTSD, Major Depression, and Related Conditions
团体跨诊断行为疗法 (G-TBT) 与特定障碍团体心理疗法在患有 PTSD、重度抑郁症和相关病症的退伍军人康复中的比较
- 批准号:
10508493 - 财政年份:2019
- 资助金额:
$ 17.99万 - 项目类别:
A Comparison of Group Transdiagnostic Behavior Therapy (G-TBT) to Disorder-Specific Group Psychotherapies in the Recovery of Veterans with PTSD, Major Depression, and Related Conditions
团体跨诊断行为疗法 (G-TBT) 与特定障碍团体心理疗法在患有 PTSD、重度抑郁症和相关病症的退伍军人康复中的比较
- 批准号:
10844353 - 财政年份:2019
- 资助金额:
$ 17.99万 - 项目类别:
Double Bias: Group comparison and variable selection under length-biased sampling and covariate imbalance.
双偏差:长度偏差采样和协变量不平衡下的组比较和变量选择。
- 批准号:
217398-2013 - 财政年份:2017
- 资助金额:
$ 17.99万 - 项目类别:
Discovery Grants Program - Individual
A comparison of the effects of dosage and group dynamics on discourse outcomes in aphasia
剂量和群体动态对失语症话语结果影响的比较
- 批准号:
9231559 - 财政年份:2017
- 资助金额:
$ 17.99万 - 项目类别:
Comparison between experimental group decision making and mock deliberation in mixed jury trial.
混合陪审团审判中实验群体决策与模拟审议的比较。
- 批准号:
16K21491 - 财政年份:2016
- 资助金额:
$ 17.99万 - 项目类别:
Grant-in-Aid for Young Scientists (B)
a study of incomplete strategic group management- in comparison with Japan ,USA and German management
不完全战略集团管理研究——与日本、美国、德国管理比较
- 批准号:
16K03892 - 财政年份:2016
- 资助金额:
$ 17.99万 - 项目类别:
Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C)