Collaborative Research: Validity Evidence for Measurement in Mathematics Education

合作研究：数学教育测量的有效性证据

• 批准号: 1644314
• 负责人: Jonathan Bostic
• 金额: $ 8.71万
• 依托单位: Bowling Green State University
• 依托单位国家: 美国
• 项目类别: Standard Grant
• 财政年份: 2016
• 资助国家: 美国
• 起止时间: 2016-09-15 至 2018-08-31
• 项目状态: 已结题
• 来源: https://www.nsf.gov/awardsearch/showAward?AWD_ID=1644314&HistoricalAwards=false
• 关键词: Collaborative; Research; Validity; Evidence; Measurement

The purpose of this proposal is to convene scholars at a two-day conference to closely examine validity-related measurement issues, create a guidelines for the field of mathematics education research that addresses key ideas (e.g., validity, validity arguments, evidence for validity and measurement at-scale), and set a clear pathway for scholars to discuss quantitative measurement within mathematics education. Invitees will include a mix of young, older and diverse scholars in mathematics education research. Products include refereed journal articles along with a website.The workshop will engage the Mathematics Education, Policy, Statistical, Psychometrics and other education research communities in examining and critiquing measurement validity evidence of mathematics education research with the long-term goal of increasing the quality of quantitative inference in mathematics education research (to include improvements in the training of doctoral students).

这项建议的目的是召集学者们在为期两天的会议上密切审查与效度相关的测量问题，为数学教育研究领域创建一个涉及关键概念(例如，效度、效度论证、有效性证据和量表测量)的指导方针，并为学者们讨论数学教育中的量化测量开辟一条明确的途径。受邀者将包括年轻、年长和不同的数学教育研究学者。研讨会将邀请数学教育、政策、统计学、心理测量学和其他教育研究团体审查和评价数学教育研究的测量有效性证据，以提高数学教育研究中定量推理的质量(包括改进博士生的培训)。

项目成果

Organizing and Examining Currently Available Quantitative Assessments

组织和检查当前可用的定量评估

• 发表时间: 2017
• 期刊: EHR-CORE National Science Foundation PI Convening
• 作者: Bostic, J.

Moving forward: Instruments and opportunities for aligning current practices with testing standards

展望未来：使当前实践与测试标准保持一致的工具和机会

• 发表时间: 2017
• 期刊: Investigations in mathematics learning
• 作者: Bostic, J. D.

Argument-Based Validation in Practice: Examples from Mathematics Education

实践中基于论证的验证：数学教育的例子

• 发表时间: 2019
• 期刊: Applied measurement in education
• 影响因子: 1.5
• 作者: Krupa, E.;Carney, M.;& Bostic, J.
• 通讯作者: & Bostic, J.

Examining the arguments surrounding the argument-based approach to validation: A systematic review of validation methodology

检查围绕基于论证的验证方法的论点：验证方法的系统回顾

• 发表时间: 2018
• 期刊: American Educational Research Association
• 作者: Lavery, M.;Carney, M.;Bostic, J.;Shih, J.;Krupa, E.;Wilson, M.;Kruse, L
• 通讯作者: Kruse, L

EXPLORING AND EXAMINING QUANTITATIVE MEASURES

探索和检验定量措施

• 发表时间: 2017
• 期刊: Psychology of Mathematics Education North America
• 作者: Shih, J.;Bostic, J.;Carney, M.;Krupa, E.
• 通讯作者: Krupa, E.