RR Workshop Proposal: Transparency and Qualitative Social Science

RR 研讨会提案：透明度和定性社会科学

• 批准号: 1735899
• 负责人: Dena Plemmons
• 金额: $ 4.28万
• 依托单位: University of California-Riverside
• 依托单位国家: 美国
• 项目类别: Standard Grant
• 财政年份: 2017
• 资助国家: 美国
• 起止时间: 2017-08-01 至 2018-10-31
• 项目状态: 已结题
• 来源: https://www.nsf.gov/awardsearch/showAward?AWD_ID=1735899&HistoricalAwards=false
• 关键词: RR; Workshop; Proposal; Transparency; Qualitative

This one and one-half day workshop will focus on the meanings, implications and impact of increased transparency and accountability in scientific research and scholarship for qualitative research. The workshop brings together practitioners from the disciplines of political science, sociology and anthropology to discuss the multiple meanings of transparency and accountability, both across and within different practices of science. This workshop focuses on ethical questions about the when, why, where and how of the impact of evaluation, transparency and accountability on qualitative work. The research agenda developed from this workshop will be of interest to researchers, policymakers and participants in qualitative research.This workshop will bring together qualitative researchers to focus on: (1) underlying assumptions of various calls to "make transparent" particular kinds of qualitative research data; (2) clarification of appropriate implementation activities to increase transparency; (3) the role of professional associations in discussion, development, and implementation of disciplinary standards; and (4) the role of data management plans in qualitative accountability. The workshop will contribute to improved understanding of issues arising from the calls for data access and transparency in the context of qualitative research. It will generate a white paper on the challenges identified for qualitative research, transcparency and accountability.

这次为期一天半的研讨会将重点讨论提高科学研究和定性研究的透明度和问责制的意义、影响和影响。研讨会汇集了来自政治学、社会学和人类学学科的实践者，讨论透明度和问责制在不同科学实践中的多重含义。本次研讨会的重点是关于评估、透明度和问责制何时、为何、何地以及如何影响定性工作的伦理问题。本次研讨会制定的研究议程将引起定性研究的研究人员、政策制定者和参与者的兴趣。本次研讨会将汇集定性研究人员，重点关注：(1)各种要求“透明”特定类型定性研究数据的潜在假设；(2)澄清适当的执行活动，以增加透明度；（三）专业协会在学科标准的讨论、制定和实施中的作用；(4)数据管理计划在定性问责中的作用。讲习班将有助于更好地了解由于要求在定性研究方面取得数据和提高透明度而引起的问题。它将生成一份白皮书，阐述定性研究、透明度和问责制所面临的挑战。