Behavioral Nudges in a Wildfire Risk Context: Social Comparison and Community Type

野火风险背景下的行为推动：社会比较和社区类型

• 批准号: 1823509
• 负责人: Hannah Brenkert-Smith
• 金额: $ 38.92万
• 依托单位: University of Colorado at Boulder
• 依托单位国家: 美国
• 项目类别: Continuing Grant
• 财政年份: 2018
• 资助国家: 美国
• 起止时间: 2018-07-01 至 2021-12-31
• 项目状态: 已结题
• 来源: https://www.nsf.gov/awardsearch/showAward?AWD_ID=1823509&HistoricalAwards=false
• 关键词: Behavioral; Nudges; Wildfire; Risk; Context

Wildfires cost billions of dollars to suppress annually, yet they still devastate lives, communities, and ecosystems. The government and other entities invest significantly in supporting wildfire risk mitigation on private property and related education to the public. This project investigates the efficacy of a relatively low-cost approach to increase citizens' engagement with these efforts, potentially increasing their effectiveness. Specifically, the project involves an experiment examining the extent to which including different types of wildfire risk assessment information (community-level, parcel-level, comparative) in the outreach material influences peoples' behavior. The experiment will also investigate the behavioral effects of including personalized and social comparison information. The behavioral outcomes measured in the experiment reflect the kinds of behaviors risk reduction education and outreach efforts across the nation are intended to promote. If found effective, the studied approach could be implemented in other areas where parcel level risk assessments exist, related to a range of hazards.The experimental design applies different information treatments to direct mailings that encourages residents to access multiple sources of information provided by practitioners, including local community meetings. This design allows exploration of how existing biases may be leveraged to encourage behaviors that are individually, socially, and environmentally beneficial. From risk information seeking to mitigation activities, the behavioral outcomes that result from nudges involving personalization and social comparison will be measured across different community types in order to assess the role social context plays in such outcomes. Importantly, the project builds on a unique researcher-practitioner collaboration to conduct the study in communities in the wildland-urban interface, where residents face high risk of wildfire-related losses.This award reflects NSF's statutory mission and has been deemed worthy of support through evaluation using the Foundation's intellectual merit and broader impacts review criteria.

野火每年要花费数十亿美元来扑灭，但它们仍然破坏了国家的生活，社区和生态系统。政府和其他实体大力投资，支持减轻私人财产的野火风险，并向公众提供相关教育。该项目调查了一种成本相对较低的方法的效力，以增加公民对这些努力的参与，从而有可能提高其效力。具体而言，该项目涉及一项实验，研究在宣传材料中包括不同类型的野火风险评估信息（社区层面，包裹层面，比较）对人们行为的影响程度。该实验还将研究包括个性化和社会比较信息的行为影响。实验中测量的行为结果反映了全国范围内减少风险教育和推广工作旨在促进的行为类型。如果发现有效的，研究的方法可以在其他地区的包裹级风险评估存在，相关的一系列hazards.The实验设计适用于不同的信息处理，鼓励居民直接邮寄，访问多个信息来源提供的从业人员，包括当地社区会议。这种设计允许探索如何利用现有的偏见来鼓励对个人、社会和环境有益的行为。从寻求风险信息到缓解活动，涉及个性化和社会比较的轻推所产生的行为结果将在不同的社区类型中进行测量，以评估社会背景在这些结果中所起的作用。重要的是，该项目建立在一个独特的研究人员和实践者的合作基础上，在荒地-城市界面的社区进行研究，那里的居民面临着野火相关损失的高风险。该奖项反映了NSF的法定使命，并通过使用基金会的知识价值和更广泛的影响审查标准进行评估，被认为值得支持。

项目成果

Developing Behavioral and Evidence-Based Programs for Wildfire Risk Mitigation

• DOI: 10.3390/fire3040066
• 发表时间: 2020-12-01
• 期刊: FIRE-SWITZERLAND
• 影响因子: 3.2
• 作者: Byerly, Hilary;Meldrum, James R.;Barth, Chris
• 通讯作者: Barth, Chris