Planning Grant: Engineering Research Center for In-Situ Control of the Nitrogen Cycle (In-SINC)

规划资助：氮循环原位控制工程研究中心（In-SINC）

• 批准号: 1840402
• 负责人: Gerardine Botte
• 金额: $ 10万
• 依托单位: Ohio University
• 依托单位国家: 美国
• 项目类别: Standard Grant
• 财政年份: 2018
• 资助国家: 美国
• 起止时间: 2018-09-01 至 2020-01-31
• 项目状态: 已结题
• 来源: https://www.nsf.gov/awardsearch/showAward?AWD_ID=1840402&HistoricalAwards=false
• 关键词: Planning; Grant; Engineering; Research; Center

The Planning Grants for Engineering Research Centers competition was run as a pilot solicitation within the ERC program. Planning grants are not required as part of the full ERC competition, but intended to build capacity among teams to plan for convergent, center-scale engineering research. This planning grant will develop well-formulated plans for a future Engineering Research Center for In-Situ Control of the Nitrogen Cycle. The program combines expertise in engineering, chemistry, data science and analytics, environmental science, and social and policy science, and establishes a flexible and robust process to identify and engage stakeholders. These stakeholders span academia, industry, and government, and will collaborate in the planning grant to define convergent research themes within four primary thrusts: (1) distributed fertilizer manufacturing, (2) efficient and controlled application of nitrogen fertilizer, (3) fertilizer recycling, and (4) nitrogen cycles as social-ecological systems. Development within these themes provides a platform for a sustainable "closed loop approach" for 21st century food supply, where nitrogenous fertilizers are efficiently produced, applied, and recycled at or near the site of application. Information gathered from the core team and stakeholders during the initial stages of the planning process will be developed into a formal set of technical goals within each of the four thrust areas.This project has the potential to advance knowledge in the distributed small-scale ammonia production, the availability of nitrogen flow and application models, knowledge of soil and water chemistry and nitrogen-based environmental effects, and achieving a heightened understanding of the interface of technologies with socio-ecological systems. The proposed program establishes the necessary convergence approach required to address these challenges, while narrowing focus to challenges related to fertilizer inefficiencies, and to engineering-based approaches and adoption. The program brings broad expertise, including expertise required to link technology efforts with societal impact, establishes convergence research themes, and develops metrics appropriate for measuring progress towards these themes. Over-production and application of nitrogen fertilizer in the developed world is responsible for a broad range of deleterious environmental effects, even while agriculture in the developing world suffers from a lack of bioavailable nitrogen. The planning grant catalyzes a process to solve challenges related to fertilizer production, application, and recycling, with additional focus on the regulatory and economic factors that ultimately connect engineering innovation with societal impact.This award reflects NSF's statutory mission and has been deemed worthy of support through evaluation using the Foundation's intellectual merit and broader impacts review criteria.

工程研究中心的规划赠款竞争是作为ERC计划内的试点招标运行。 规划赠款不需要作为整个ERC竞争的一部分，但旨在建立团队之间的能力，以规划融合的中心规模的工程研究。这项规划补助金将为未来的氮循环原位控制工程研究中心制定精心制定的计划。 该计划结合了工程，化学，数据科学和分析，环境科学以及社会和政策科学的专业知识，并建立了一个灵活而强大的流程来识别和参与利益相关者。这些利益相关者跨越学术界，工业界和政府，并将在规划补助金中合作，以确定四个主要目标内的趋同研究主题：（1）分布式肥料制造，（2）氮肥的有效和受控应用，（3）肥料回收，以及（4）氮循环作为社会生态系统。这些主题的发展为21世纪世纪粮食供应的可持续“闭环方法”提供了一个平台，其中氮肥在施用地点或附近有效地生产、施用和回收。在规划过程的初始阶段从核心团队和利益相关者收集的信息将发展成为四个重点领域中每一个领域的一套正式的技术目标。该项目有可能促进分布式小规模氨生产、氮流和应用模型的可用性、土壤和水化学以及氮基环境影响方面的知识，以及更好地理解技术与社会生态系统的相互作用。拟议的计划建立了应对这些挑战所需的必要融合方法，同时将重点缩小到与肥料效率低下有关的挑战，以及基于工程的方法和采用。该计划带来了广泛的专业知识，包括将技术工作与社会影响联系起来所需的专业知识，建立融合研究主题，并制定适合衡量这些主题进展的指标。发达国家过度生产和施用氮肥造成了广泛的有害环境影响，即使发展中国家的农业缺乏生物可利用的氮。该计划资助促进了一个过程，以解决与化肥生产，应用和回收相关的挑战，并额外关注最终将工程创新与社会影响联系起来的监管和经济因素。该奖项反映了NSF的法定使命，并通过使用基金会的知识价值和更广泛的影响审查标准进行评估，被认为值得支持。