权益分类	功能权益	普通用户	{{item.name}}会员
{{category.name}}	{{benefitItem.name}}

The relation of infrastructures and rurality

基础设施与乡村的关系

基本信息

批准号：
236451363
负责人：
Professorin Dr. Eva Barlösius
金额：
--
依托单位：
Institut für Soziologie
依托单位国家：
德国
项目类别：
Research Grants
财政年份：
2013
资助国家：
德国
起止时间：
2012-12-31 至 2014-12-31
项目状态：
已结题

来源：
https://gepris.dfg.de/gepris/projekt/236451363?language=en
关键词：
relation infrastructures rurality

项目摘要

The understanding of infrastructures is becoming increasingly blurred. Originally they were defined by technical buildings and industrial structures, then social and cultural features were added. Rules and regulations (e.g. laws and social norms) became the next central point of reference and currently the functions of infrastructures (e.g. education, mobility) are the defining criteria. The increasing inclusion of social traits and functions of infrastructures can be shown by looking at the changes of the definition and use of the term. Furthermore, it clarifies that infrastructures inhibit a specific understanding of socialness (community and communality) which is facilitated and enforced by infrastructures.The proposed research project shall explore the aspect of socialness of infrastructures using the example of (German) villages. We want to differentiate between the material and social structural qualities of villages on one hand, and on the other hand the quality of community and communality of villages which are considered typical for villages.Central research questions are: Which understanding of community and communality are inhibited in rural, spatially fixed infrastructures? Does it correspond with the phenomenon of rurality? How are these infrastructures contributing to the phenomenon of rurality? The project focuses on spatially fixed infrastructures and departs with a broad understanding of infrastructures that encompasses e.g. local shops, restaurants, and pubs.

对基础设施的理解越来越模糊。最初，它们被定义为技术建筑和工业建筑，然后添加了社会和文化特征。规则和条例（例如法律和社会规范）成为下一个中心点，目前基础设施的功能（例如教育、流动性）是界定标准。基础设施的社会特征和功能越来越多地被包括在内，这可以从该术语定义和使用的变化中看出。此外，它澄清了基础设施抑制社会性（社区和社区性）的具体理解，这是促进和基础设施的执行。拟议的研究项目将探讨基础设施的社会性方面使用（德国）村庄的例子。我们要区分的物质和社会结构质量的村庄，一方面，另一方面的质量社区和社区的村庄被认为是典型的villages.Central研究问题：社区和社区的理解是抑制在农村，空间固定的基础设施？它是否与乡村化现象相对应？这些基础设施是如何促成农村化现象的？该项目侧重于空间固定的基础设施，并对包括当地商店，餐馆和酒吧在内的基础设施有广泛的了解。