The relation of infrastructures and rurality

对基础设施的理解正变得越来越模糊。它们最初是由技术建筑和产业结构来定义的，后来又增加了社会和文化特征。规则和条例(如法律和社会规范)成为下一个中心参照点，目前基础设施的功能(如教育、流动性)是定义标准。通过观察该术语定义和使用的变化，可以看出基础设施的社会特征和功能越来越多地被纳入其中。此外，它还澄清了基础设施阻碍了对社会性(社区和社区)的具体理解，而基础设施促进和加强了社会性。拟议的研究项目将以(德国)村庄为例探索基础设施的社会性方面。我们想要区分村庄的物质和社会结构质量，以及被认为是村庄典型的社区和社区的质量。中心研究问题是：在农村，空间固定的基础设施中，哪些对社区和社区的理解受到限制？这与乡村现象相对应吗？这些基础设施是如何促成乡村现象的？该项目专注于空间固定的基础设施，并对基础设施有广泛的了解，包括当地的商店、餐馆和酒吧。

The understanding of infrastructures is becoming increasingly blurred. Originally they were defined by technical buildings and industrial structures, then social and cultural features were added. Rules and regulations (e.g. laws and social norms) became the next central point of reference and currently the functions of infrastructures (e.g. education, mobility) are the defining criteria. The increasing inclusion of social traits and functions of infrastructures can be shown by looking at the changes of the definition and use of the term. Furthermore, it clarifies that infrastructures inhibit a specific understanding of socialness (community and communality) which is facilitated and enforced by infrastructures.The proposed research project shall explore the aspect of socialness of infrastructures using the example of (German) villages. We want to differentiate between the material and social structural qualities of villages on one hand, and on the other hand the quality of community and communality of villages which are considered typical for villages.Central research questions are: Which understanding of community and communality are inhibited in rural, spatially fixed infrastructures? Does it correspond with the phenomenon of rurality? How are these infrastructures contributing to the phenomenon of rurality? The project focuses on spatially fixed infrastructures and departs with a broad understanding of infrastructures that encompasses e.g. local shops, restaurants, and pubs.